Purpose: Narcotics abuse is a chronic problem that plagues Indonesia. Narcotics are not intended for purposes other than medical purposes. However, there are still people who still dare to plant marijuana trees which are strictly prohibited as regulated in Articles 111 and 112 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which explains the prohibition on growing marijuana unlawfully. The formulation of the problem in this research is first, How is Narcotics Crime Regulated in Indonesia? Second, what is the criminal responsibility of marijuana growers according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics? The aim of the research is to answer this research problem. Methodology: The type of research used is normative legal research which refers to research studies on statutory regulations combined with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique is by using Library Research. The nature of the research is descriptive analysis. Results: The research results show that Indonesia has strict regulations that do not legalize narcotics carelessly, the prohibition is regulated in Article 111 Paragraphs 1, 2 and 112 Paragraphs 1, 2 of Law 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Second, every person who without right or against the law plants, maintains, owns, stores, controls or provides narcotics in the form of plants legally and convincingly can be held criminally liable. In conclusion, Indonesia as a legal country has strict regulations to protect the young generation of the Indonesian nation from the dangers of narcotics abuse. Every person who owns, processes and distributes narcotics against their rights can be held liable for imprisonment for a minimum of 4 years, a maximum of 12 years, a fine of at least 800 million and a maximum of 8 billion rupiah. Limitation: This research is to explain and/or describe and describe all data obtained from data sources related to criminal liability for marijuana growers. Contribution: Indonesia does not legalize the use of narcotics against the law. If this happens, they can be held criminally liable.

Purpose: To explain the struggle in obtaining and utilizing natural resources, including land, the current legislation is unable to protect the rights of the community and tends to give more rights to the owners. Methods: This research is typical (normative). Primary legal materials, or primary legal materials that have authority, and secondary legal materials are two types of research sources Result: The government must also play a role in placing land along the coast because someone must regulate land to ensure the safety of people living along the coast. Agrarian regulations for coastal communities have legal certainty regarding the possibility of eliminating land rights if the land is given to the state and destroyed. The allocation, use, provision and maintenance of land are all regulated and managed by the state. Limitations: Law Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands, management of coastal areas and small islands must have HP-3 (Coastal Water Management Rights) (UU PWP-PPK). Contribution: Basic Agrarian Regulations, promulgated based on Law no. 5 of 1960, provides legal certainty regarding the elimination of ownership rights to land when it is handed over to the state and destroyed.

Purpose: This research was conducted to find out about the phenomenon of safekeeping of goods with Ship's Crew (ABK) in Punggur Harbor, Batam City. Methodology : This study uses a type or method of normative legal research, in which the research is carried out by examining legal materials related to cases of safekeeping of goods against Ship's Crews (ABK). Then after that it was continued by examining additional data in the form of interviews conducted with Ship's Crew (ABK) at Punggur Port, Batam City, which later became Normative-Empirical legal research. Result: The result is reveals that agrarian policies in Bintan have led to the loss of land ownership rights for many coastal communities due to lack of consultation, inadequate compensation, and insufficient protection of traditional land tenure systems. Limitation: The ship's crew is the other crew than the captain. The phenomenon of entrusting goods to ship crew is very common for people who are used to life in the port. So it is not uncommon for many Ship's Crew to be reluctant to reject things that are considered normal by the people around them. Contribution: The analysis aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on land rights and coastal development in Indonesia by providing a legal perspective on the issue. It also highlights the need for greater recognition of the rights of coastal communities in agrarian policies and regulatory frameworks.