Identifikasi Modal Sosial dan Kekuasaan dalam Underground Economy Pasar Maling, Kota Malang

https://doi.org/10.35912/sekp.v3i1.2591
Published: Oct 22, 2024

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to reveal the role of social capital and power structures in the underground economy of Pasar Maling, Malang City.

Methodology: This study used a phenomenological qualitative method. To obtain data, unstructured interviews and observations were conducted with triangulation of sources and Nvivo14 was used to process the data.

Results: The research reveals the role of social capital in strengthening the existence of the underground economy through four main aspects: trust, networks, information, and norms. The power structure that can provide rules or contracts at Pasar Maling Malang City is in the form of informal contracts and is dominated by the non-government community, namely the Madurese ethnic community. This market is similar to a perfect competition market, but in the ongoing economy market, Pasar Maling Malang City has restrictions on entering the market or barriers to entry. Only people of the same ethnicity can participate in and conduct trading activities in Pasar Maling Malang City.

Limitations: This research only focuses on the market's internal perspective, including sellers and the surrounding community in Pasar Maling.

Contribution: This research may provide additional knowledge for readers and serve as a reference for further research on underground economy.

Keywords:
1. Malang City
2. Pasar Maling
3. Power Structure
4. Social Capital
5. Underground Economy
Authors:
1 . Ni Made Rina Purnami
2 . Alisya Dewi Kusumawardani
3 . Amrita Puteri Wijaya Kusumawardani
4 . Privo Divanya Yuniar
5 . Ni Putu Ayu Finansya Saptarini
6 . Silvi Asna Prestianawati
View PDF
How to Cite
Purnami, N. M. R., Kusumawardani, A. D., Kusumawardani, . A. P. W., Yuniar, P. D., Saptarini, N. P. A. F. ., & Prestianawati, S. A. . (2024). Identifikasi Modal Sosial dan Kekuasaan dalam Underground Economy Pasar Maling, Kota Malang . Studi Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.35912/sekp.v3i1.2591
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Juli
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Affandi, A. J. (2022). Potensi Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kegiatan Underground Economy (2013: 1-2020: 4). UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA.

    Amalia, S., Wijaya, A., Darma, D. C., Maria, S., & Lestari, D. (2020). Underground Economy: Teori & Catatan Kelam.

    Apriliyadi, E. K., & Hendrix, T. (2021). Kajian fenomena pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia: Perspektif wacana, pengetahuan dan kekuasaan Foucault. Jurnal Indonesia Maju, 1(1), 28-48.

    Fathy, R. (2019). Modal sosial: Konsep, inklusivitas dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(1), 1-17.

    Halim, K., & Mahyuddin, M. (2019). Modal Sosial dan Integrasi Sosial: Asimilasi dan Akulturasi Budaya Masyarakat Multikultural di Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 12 (2), 111–122.

    Hannan, A., & Abdillah, K. (2019). Hegemoni Religio-Kekuasaan Dan Transformasi Sosial Mobilisasi Jaringan Kekuasaan dan Keagamaan Kyai dalam Dinamika Sosio-Kultural Masyarakat. Sosial Budaya, 16(1), 9-24.

    Haridison, A. (2013). Modal sosial dalam pembangunan. JISPAR: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Pemerintahan, 4, 31-40.

    Hariyanti, D., Soeharjoto, S., Tribudhi, D. A., & Ratnawati, N. (2021). Undeground Economy Di Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Moneter. Media Bina Ilmiah, 16(8), 7467-7476.

    Kamahi, U. (2017). Teori Kekuasaan Michael Foucault: Tantangan Bagi sosiologi politik.

    Mudhoffir, A. (2013). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi Sosiologi Politik. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 18 (1).

    Mulyawan, A. W. (2017). Analisis Underground Economy Indonesia dan Potensi Penerimaan Pajak di Era Tax Amnesty. Info Artha, 1(1), 60-78.

    Ramadhan, F. M. (2019). Estimation the Size of Underground Economy and Tax Potential Loss in Indonesia from 2000–2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 7(2).

    Rezky, N. P. (2020). Kajian Kegiatan Shadow Economy Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 6(2), 1671-1680.

    Santoso, T. (2020). Memahami Modal Sosial.

    Sapardi, T. (2013). Estimasi Potential Loss Penerimaan Pajak Dari Kegiatan Underground Economy dengan Pendekatan Moneter. Media Ekonomi, 21(1), 71-86.

    Tanzi, V. (2014). The Shadow Economy, Its Causes and Its Consequences.

    Tatariyanto, F. (2014). Taxing the underground economy: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(27), 236-250.

    Viphindrartin, S., & Prestianawati, S. A. (2015). The Analysis of Underground Economy Transaction Existence of Junk Night Market (JNM) in Malang City.

    Widyawan, Y. G. (2020). Analisis Modal Sosial: Peran Kepercayaam, Jaringan, Dan Norma Terhadap Inovasi Umkm Batik (Studi Tentang Modal Sosial Di UMKM). Universitas Sanata Dharma.

    Yustika, A. E. (2013). Ekonomi kelembagaan : paradigma, teori, dan kebijakan.

  1. Affandi, A. J. (2022). Potensi Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kegiatan Underground Economy (2013: 1-2020: 4). UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA.
  2. Amalia, S., Wijaya, A., Darma, D. C., Maria, S., & Lestari, D. (2020). Underground Economy: Teori & Catatan Kelam.
  3. Apriliyadi, E. K., & Hendrix, T. (2021). Kajian fenomena pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia: Perspektif wacana, pengetahuan dan kekuasaan Foucault. Jurnal Indonesia Maju, 1(1), 28-48.
  4. Fathy, R. (2019). Modal sosial: Konsep, inklusivitas dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(1), 1-17.
  5. Halim, K., & Mahyuddin, M. (2019). Modal Sosial dan Integrasi Sosial: Asimilasi dan Akulturasi Budaya Masyarakat Multikultural di Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 12 (2), 111–122.
  6. Hannan, A., & Abdillah, K. (2019). Hegemoni Religio-Kekuasaan Dan Transformasi Sosial Mobilisasi Jaringan Kekuasaan dan Keagamaan Kyai dalam Dinamika Sosio-Kultural Masyarakat. Sosial Budaya, 16(1), 9-24.
  7. Haridison, A. (2013). Modal sosial dalam pembangunan. JISPAR: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Pemerintahan, 4, 31-40.
  8. Hariyanti, D., Soeharjoto, S., Tribudhi, D. A., & Ratnawati, N. (2021). Undeground Economy Di Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Moneter. Media Bina Ilmiah, 16(8), 7467-7476.
  9. Kamahi, U. (2017). Teori Kekuasaan Michael Foucault: Tantangan Bagi sosiologi politik.
  10. Mudhoffir, A. (2013). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi Sosiologi Politik. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 18 (1).
  11. Mulyawan, A. W. (2017). Analisis Underground Economy Indonesia dan Potensi Penerimaan Pajak di Era Tax Amnesty. Info Artha, 1(1), 60-78.
  12. Ramadhan, F. M. (2019). Estimation the Size of Underground Economy and Tax Potential Loss in Indonesia from 2000–2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 7(2).
  13. Rezky, N. P. (2020). Kajian Kegiatan Shadow Economy Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 6(2), 1671-1680.
  14. Santoso, T. (2020). Memahami Modal Sosial.
  15. Sapardi, T. (2013). Estimasi Potential Loss Penerimaan Pajak Dari Kegiatan Underground Economy dengan Pendekatan Moneter. Media Ekonomi, 21(1), 71-86.
  16. Tanzi, V. (2014). The Shadow Economy, Its Causes and Its Consequences.
  17. Tatariyanto, F. (2014). Taxing the underground economy: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(27), 236-250.
  18. Viphindrartin, S., & Prestianawati, S. A. (2015). The Analysis of Underground Economy Transaction Existence of Junk Night Market (JNM) in Malang City.
  19. Widyawan, Y. G. (2020). Analisis Modal Sosial: Peran Kepercayaam, Jaringan, Dan Norma Terhadap Inovasi Umkm Batik (Studi Tentang Modal Sosial Di UMKM). Universitas Sanata Dharma.
  20. Yustika, A. E. (2013). Ekonomi kelembagaan : paradigma, teori, dan kebijakan.