Purpose: This study aims to analyze the financial performance of Tridadi Makmur Village-Owned Enterprises (BUM Desa) in 2018-2020 using financial ratios in the form of liquidity, solvency, and activity ratios. The research method used is a quantitative descriptive method, using secondary data in the form of financial statements from the Tridadi Makmur Village BUM. Methodology: The sample in this study is Tridadi Makmur's balance sheet and income statement (BUM Desa) for the 2018-2020 period which was carried out using the purposive sampling, data acquisition technique that is by using the method of documentation, interviews, and literature study. method.The data analysis method used is descriptive analysis techniques. Results: The financial performance of Tridadi Makmur Village BUM from 2018 to 2020 based on the current ratio analysis resulted in a very good figure of 210.6%. Based on the results of the quick ratio analysis analysis, it produced a fairly good figure with an average of 167.2%. Based on the results of the cash ratio analysis analysis, it produces a figure that is categorized as bad, namely with an average of 35.0%. Based on the results of the analysis of the debt to asset ratio analysis, it produces a very good figure, namely with an average of 25.5%. Based on the results of the analysis of the debt to equity ratio analysis, it produces a very good categorized figure, namely with an average of 34.3%. Based on the results of the analysis of the debt to equity ratio analysis, it produces a very good categorized figure, namely with an average of 34.3%. Based on the results of the analysis of the total asset turnover ratio (total asset turnover) produced a figure that was categorized as bad, namely with an average of 0.64 times. Limititaions: This study found that from various financial ratio analyzes used, the debt-to-asset ratio and debt-to-equity ratio were categorized as being in a very good position compared to the total asset turnover ratio ( total asset turnover). Contribution: This research is expected to increase knowledge about how village-owned enterprises (BUM Desa) in particular can improve governance and how to manage finances according to the type of business being run.

Purpose: This study provides a more accurate picture of how financial distress and corporate governance influence managerial discretion, where the target of this research is the banking industry which is the industry with the largest financial assets. Companies that have large financial assets also have large allowances for impairment losses, and this is the main factor driving accrual-based company profits. This research activity is expected to provide scientific and practical benefits as well as a new view on financial distress, corporate governance and managerial discretion. For the banking industry, it provides an understanding of whether the recognition of allowance for impairment losses can be affected by financial distress and/or corporate governance. Method: This research uses a multiple linear regression with quantitative data. The sample selection in this study was carried out using a purposive sampling method, which is a sampling method that applies certain criteria according to the research objectives. The population in this study are companies in the banking industry that are listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. In this study, five years of observation were carried out from 2017 to 2021. Result: Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that financial distress, institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioners, and proportion of audit committee have no effect on managerial discretion. It refutes the hypotheses regarding the influence of financial distress and corporate governance on managerial discretion over the recognition of allowance for impairment losses. However, the managerial ownership has a positive influence on managerial discretion, which raises a possibility that managers who own shares of a company have a desire to get more benefits from the cost of equity and/or capital gains.

Purpose: This descriptive study aims to explain technological determinants related to the disclosure of local government financial statements proxied in the variables of Telecommunications Network (X1), Internet Access (X2), Technology Development (X3), e-Government (X4), Website Accessibility (X5), Press Visibility (X6), and E-Procurement (X7) Method: A quantitative approach at the descriptive level is used in this study. The non-probability technique of the purposive sampling type obtained 450 observations from 150 samples of district local governments in Indonesia during 2017-2019 through documentation and literature review of secondary data. Data analysis using SPSS software. Results: The average level of telecommunications networks, quality of internet access, technology development, e-government, ease of website accessibility, and the frequency of procuring goods and services online for Indonesian local governments are in moderate numbers. Limitations: This study is only up to the level of describing the sample and using a limited number of ICT determinants. Some of the technological factor data used in this study are not detailed based on the district government, due to limited information obtained through the Ministry of Communication and Information and the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). Contribution: These findings contribute to central and regional governments as regulators and decision makers in formulating policies to consider technological factors related to financial report disclosure in order to realize transparency and public accountability in a time-effective and cost-efficient manner.