Meningkatkan Penalaran Statistik melalui Mengerjakan Soal Latihan Secara Aktif pada Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Airlangga

https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v5i2.3162
Published: Dec 5, 2024

Abstract:

Purpose: Statistical reasoning is the way people reason with ideas, relate one concept to another, and can interpret statistical results. Doing tasks actively to develop cognitive abilities. The aim is to build statistical reasoning so that participants can explore data, be able to see data as aggregates, how to organize and interpret results.

Methodology: The form of activity is to provide training through giving exercise/doing assignments that require active participants to develop cognitive abilities. a model of cognitive development that incorporates statistical processes.

Results: Ability to explain data, most have difficulty reasoning about different data. The average is 64.44. The training results showed that there was understanding in explaining data in different situations, the average is 71.85. The ability to organize data shows that participants have knowledge about how to observe data according to statistical procedures. The average value is 76.67. Data presentation skills show that participants can display and interpret data. The average is 78.89.

Conclusions: Participants have an average ability in explaining data, organizing data, and presenting data. Learning statistical concepts requires statistical practice, which takes a considerable amount of time for learning. This reasoning process provides participants with the opportunity to develop their statistical knowledge. Statistical reasoning should be continuously applied to students, as they constantly encounter dynamic data.

Limitations: Since the study is focused on a specific geographic area (Gurabati Subdistrict)4, the findings may not be directly applicable to other regions with different urban planning, waste collection practices, or traffic conditions.

Contribution: The results of the assignment concluded that the practice of analyzing data influenced the participants' knowledge insight.

Keywords:
1. Active tasks
2. Cognitive abilities
3. Exercise
4. Statistical Reasoning
Authors:
1 . Rachmah Indawati
2 . Mochammad Bagus Qomaruddin
3 . Riris Diana Rachmayanti
View PDF
How to Cite
Indawati, R., Qomaruddin, M. B. ., & Rachmayanti, R. D. (2024). Meningkatkan Penalaran Statistik melalui Mengerjakan Soal Latihan Secara Aktif pada Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Airlangga. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v5i2.3162
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Desember
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Akkus, R., & Karakaya, M. (2020). The Effects of the Professional Development Program Supported by On-the-Job Visits on the Pedagogies of Mathematics Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8481

    Amran, M. S., & Bakar, A. Y. A. (2022). The Use of Humour and Its’ Relation to Motivation in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Creative Education, 13(8), 2577-2586. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.138164

    Anekawati, A., Matlubah, H., & Habibi. (2024). Pelatihan Analisis Rasch untuk MGMP Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMP/MTs Kabupaten Sumenep. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 417-425. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2741

    Ardhy, F., Salimu, S. A., Fernanda, F. E., Hidayat, R., & Almasir, D. I. (2024). Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Ajar Pintu Lestari Indonesia (PITARIA) sebagai Alat Peraga Untuk Memperkenalkan Budaya Indonesia pada IGTKI-PGRI Kabupaten Tanggamus. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 327-336. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2665

    Bature, I. J., & Campus, C. (2020). The Mathematics Teachers Shift from the Traditional Teacher-Centred Classroom to a More Constructivist Student-Centred Epistemology. Open Access Library Journal, 7(5), 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106389

    Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and Collective Mathematical Development: The Case of Statistical Data Analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0101_1

    Engin, O., & Pusmaz, A. (2021). An Analysis of High School Students’ Understanding and Reasoning of Average Concept. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(1), 187-201. doi:https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.780680

    Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, G. C., Nehm, R. H., & Harms, U. (2019). How Strongly Does Statistical Reasoning Influence Knowledge and Acceptance of Evolution?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1183-1206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547

    Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to Studying Formal and Everyday Reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 331-351. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331

    Gulburnu, M., & Gurbuz, R. (2023). An Investigation of Sociomathematical Norms Perceived by Students Regarding the Legitimacy of Solutions. South African Journal of Education, 43(3), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n3a2215

    Hidajat, F. A. (2023). Development of Digital Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on a Self-Regulated Learning Approach to Increase the Creativity of Jakarta Teachers. Engagement: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(2), 292-302. doi:https://doi.org/10.29062/engagement.v7i2.1486

    Jia, B., Zhu, Z., & Gao, H. (2021). International Comparative Study of Statistics Learning Trajectories Based on PISA Data on Cognitive Diagnostic Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657858

    Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., Mooney, E. S., Wares, A., Jones, M. R., . . . Nisbet, S. (2001). Using Students' Statistical Thinking to Inform Instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 109-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00064-5

    Landtblom, K. (2023). Opportunities to Learn Mean, Median, and Mode Afforded by Textbook Tasks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(3), 12-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.655

    Landtblom, K., & Sumpter, L. (2021). Teachers and Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions About Averages. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 4(1), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.03.2019.02

    Leavy, A. (2020). Data and Chance in the Senior Primary Classes. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Irlandia.

    Lunevich, L. (2021). Creativity in Teaching and Teaching for Creativity in Engineering and Science in Higher Education-Revisiting Vygotsky’s Psychology of Art. Creative Education, 12(7), 1445-1457. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127110

    Mulyaningsih, H., Hutagalung, S. S., Sulistiowati, R., & Sulistio, E. B. (2023). Pelatihan Penyusunan LAKIP Berperspektif Gender di Pemerintah Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i1.1930

    Rahmatina, D., Nusantara, T., Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2022). Statistical Reasoning Process of Students in Decision Making Using Commognitive Framework. Acta Scientiae, 24(3), 63-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6603

    Ramadhani, R. (2021). Kemampuan Penalaran Statistik Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Statistik Menggunakan Model Flipped Classroom Berbasis SPSS dan STATCAL: Studi Eksperime. TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 2(2), 86-91.

    Romli, N. A., Safitri, D., Nurpratiwi, S., & Hakim, L. (2021). Pelatihan Zoom Meetings dan Streaming Youtube untuk Pengembangan Komunitas Ngaji Online. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 9-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v2i1.371

    Rosidah, & Ikram, F. Z. (2021). Measure of Central Tendency: Undergraduate Students’ Error in Decision-Making Perspective. International Journal of Education, 14(1), 39-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v14i1.29408

    Runisah, & Siregar, N. (2021). Students’ Mathematical Reasoning: How Could it be Through MHM-Problem Based Strategy Aided Interactive Multimedia?. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1477-1492. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3783

    Sloman, M. (2005). Learning in Knowledge?Intensive Organisations–Moving from Training to Learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 19(6), 9-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14777280510624259

    Sulastri, Adam, M., & Saftiana, Y. (2024). Peningkatan Literasi Hijau Menuju Desa Wisata Muara Tiga Kecamatan Mulak Ulu. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 305-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2684

    Tilawah, H., Lestari, N. D. S., Pambudi, D. S., Susanto, S., & Suwito, A. (2024). Pseudo-Construction Errors in Solving Number Pattern Problems Based on APOS Theory. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 15(1), 34-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/yrhdxd06

    Tsaniyah, R., & Ekawati, R. (2024). Analisis Penalaran Statistis Siswa SMA dengan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika, 5(2), 806-813. doi:https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i2.625

    Ulusoy, C. A., & Altay, M. K. (2017). Analyzing the Statistical Reasoning Levels of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers in the Context of a Model Eliciting Activity. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 20-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.267363

    Walidain, P. Z. B., & Ruli, R. M. (2023). Studi Kasus Kemampuan Penalaran Statistis Siswa Kelas XII pada Materi Statistika. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 73-77. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/phi.v7i1.270

    Zawojewski, J. S., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2000). Take Time for Action: Mean and Median: Are They Really So Easy?. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(7), 436-440. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.7.0436

  1. Akkus, R., & Karakaya, M. (2020). The Effects of the Professional Development Program Supported by On-the-Job Visits on the Pedagogies of Mathematics Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8481
  2. Amran, M. S., & Bakar, A. Y. A. (2022). The Use of Humour and Its’ Relation to Motivation in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Creative Education, 13(8), 2577-2586. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.138164
  3. Anekawati, A., Matlubah, H., & Habibi. (2024). Pelatihan Analisis Rasch untuk MGMP Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMP/MTs Kabupaten Sumenep. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 417-425. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2741
  4. Ardhy, F., Salimu, S. A., Fernanda, F. E., Hidayat, R., & Almasir, D. I. (2024). Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Ajar Pintu Lestari Indonesia (PITARIA) sebagai Alat Peraga Untuk Memperkenalkan Budaya Indonesia pada IGTKI-PGRI Kabupaten Tanggamus. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 327-336. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2665
  5. Bature, I. J., & Campus, C. (2020). The Mathematics Teachers Shift from the Traditional Teacher-Centred Classroom to a More Constructivist Student-Centred Epistemology. Open Access Library Journal, 7(5), 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106389
  6. Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
  7. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and Collective Mathematical Development: The Case of Statistical Data Analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0101_1
  8. Engin, O., & Pusmaz, A. (2021). An Analysis of High School Students’ Understanding and Reasoning of Average Concept. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(1), 187-201. doi:https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.780680
  9. Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, G. C., Nehm, R. H., & Harms, U. (2019). How Strongly Does Statistical Reasoning Influence Knowledge and Acceptance of Evolution?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1183-1206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547
  10. Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to Studying Formal and Everyday Reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 331-351. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331
  11. Gulburnu, M., & Gurbuz, R. (2023). An Investigation of Sociomathematical Norms Perceived by Students Regarding the Legitimacy of Solutions. South African Journal of Education, 43(3), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n3a2215
  12. Hidajat, F. A. (2023). Development of Digital Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on a Self-Regulated Learning Approach to Increase the Creativity of Jakarta Teachers. Engagement: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(2), 292-302. doi:https://doi.org/10.29062/engagement.v7i2.1486
  13. Jia, B., Zhu, Z., & Gao, H. (2021). International Comparative Study of Statistics Learning Trajectories Based on PISA Data on Cognitive Diagnostic Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657858
  14. Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., Mooney, E. S., Wares, A., Jones, M. R., . . . Nisbet, S. (2001). Using Students' Statistical Thinking to Inform Instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 109-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00064-5
  15. Landtblom, K. (2023). Opportunities to Learn Mean, Median, and Mode Afforded by Textbook Tasks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(3), 12-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.655
  16. Landtblom, K., & Sumpter, L. (2021). Teachers and Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions About Averages. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 4(1), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.03.2019.02
  17. Leavy, A. (2020). Data and Chance in the Senior Primary Classes. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Irlandia.
  18. Lunevich, L. (2021). Creativity in Teaching and Teaching for Creativity in Engineering and Science in Higher Education-Revisiting Vygotsky’s Psychology of Art. Creative Education, 12(7), 1445-1457. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127110
  19. Mulyaningsih, H., Hutagalung, S. S., Sulistiowati, R., & Sulistio, E. B. (2023). Pelatihan Penyusunan LAKIP Berperspektif Gender di Pemerintah Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i1.1930
  20. Rahmatina, D., Nusantara, T., Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2022). Statistical Reasoning Process of Students in Decision Making Using Commognitive Framework. Acta Scientiae, 24(3), 63-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6603
  21. Ramadhani, R. (2021). Kemampuan Penalaran Statistik Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Statistik Menggunakan Model Flipped Classroom Berbasis SPSS dan STATCAL: Studi Eksperime. TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 2(2), 86-91.
  22. Romli, N. A., Safitri, D., Nurpratiwi, S., & Hakim, L. (2021). Pelatihan Zoom Meetings dan Streaming Youtube untuk Pengembangan Komunitas Ngaji Online. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 9-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v2i1.371
  23. Rosidah, & Ikram, F. Z. (2021). Measure of Central Tendency: Undergraduate Students’ Error in Decision-Making Perspective. International Journal of Education, 14(1), 39-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v14i1.29408
  24. Runisah, & Siregar, N. (2021). Students’ Mathematical Reasoning: How Could it be Through MHM-Problem Based Strategy Aided Interactive Multimedia?. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1477-1492. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3783
  25. Sloman, M. (2005). Learning in Knowledge?Intensive Organisations–Moving from Training to Learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 19(6), 9-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14777280510624259
  26. Sulastri, Adam, M., & Saftiana, Y. (2024). Peningkatan Literasi Hijau Menuju Desa Wisata Muara Tiga Kecamatan Mulak Ulu. Yumary: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 305-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v4i3.2684
  27. Tilawah, H., Lestari, N. D. S., Pambudi, D. S., Susanto, S., & Suwito, A. (2024). Pseudo-Construction Errors in Solving Number Pattern Problems Based on APOS Theory. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 15(1), 34-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/yrhdxd06
  28. Tsaniyah, R., & Ekawati, R. (2024). Analisis Penalaran Statistis Siswa SMA dengan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika, 5(2), 806-813. doi:https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i2.625
  29. Ulusoy, C. A., & Altay, M. K. (2017). Analyzing the Statistical Reasoning Levels of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers in the Context of a Model Eliciting Activity. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 20-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.267363
  30. Walidain, P. Z. B., & Ruli, R. M. (2023). Studi Kasus Kemampuan Penalaran Statistis Siswa Kelas XII pada Materi Statistika. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 73-77. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/phi.v7i1.270
  31. Zawojewski, J. S., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2000). Take Time for Action: Mean and Median: Are They Really So Easy?. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(7), 436-440. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.7.0436