Evaluasi Skor Pre-Test dan Post-Test Peserta Pelatihan Teknis New SIGA di Perwakilan BKKBN Provinsi Lampung

https://doi.org/10.35912/jiw.v1i2.1266
Published: Jul 12, 2022

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate pre-test and post-test results of participants in SIGA's new technical training for BKKBN representatives in Lampung.

Research methodology: The research method used in this study is the quantitative method. The data used is the primary data obtained from the pre- and post-test scores of 30 respondents. During this time, the data analysis techniques used were descriptive analysis and paired t-test.

Results: Through the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs statistical test, it is known that the significance value (p-value) for the pretest and posttest data is 0.000 (<0.05). This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between pre-test and post-test results for New Siga Technical Training 2022 participants. Therefore, we can conclude that the knowledge of the participants are increasing after participating in the 2022 New Siga Technical Training.

Limitations: For further research, it is hoped that researchers can take a larger number of samples to form a normal curve. Moreover, it is better if the Kirkpatrick evaluation model is fully implemented, the evaluation of the performance of the education and training implementation (at level 1 and level 2) as well as post-training evaluation (level 3 and level 4). Thus, the evaluation of education and training will obtain more comprehensive results.

Contribution: The results of this study may be helpful to BKKBN Lampung for conducting proper training especially in evaluating learning outcomes.

Keywords:
1. Training evaluation
2. Pretest posttest score
Authors:
1 . Anisa Kuswandari Banuwa
2 . Annastasia Nika Susanti
View PDF
How to Cite
Banuwa, A. K., & Susanti, A. N. (2022). Evaluasi Skor Pre-Test dan Post-Test Peserta Pelatihan Teknis New SIGA di Perwakilan BKKBN Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Widyaiswara, 1(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.35912/jiw.v1i2.1266
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Juli
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Aguinis H, Kraiger K. (2009). Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organization and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 60: 451-474.

    Anthony, W. P., Kacmar, K. M., & Perrewe, P. L. (2010). Human Resource Management: A Strategic Approach. Cengage Learning: USA.

    Astuti, R., & Sari, I. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Kemasindo Cepat Nusantara Medan. Seminar Nasional Royal, 1(1), 461–464.

    Chang, R., dan Little, T. D. (2018). Innovations for Evaluation Research: Multiform Protocols, Visual Analog Scaling, and the Retrospective Pretest–Posttest Design. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 41(2), 246–269.

    Delucchi, M. (2014). Measuring Student Learning in Social Statistics. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 42(3), 231–239.

    Estrada, E., Ferrer, E., & Pardo, A. (2019). Statistics for Evaluating Pre-post Change: Relation Between Change in the Distribution Center and Change in the Individual Scores. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.

    Fitriyah, R. N. (2017). Kajian Evaluasi Pasca-Diklat dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Penyelenggaraan Diklat. Semarang.

    Halawi, A., & Haydar, N. (2018). Effects of Training on Employee Performance: A Case Study of Bonjus and Khatib&Alami Companies. Business Economics and Tourism, 5(2), 59.

    Henryanto. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Peserta Diklat dari Kualitas Pelayanan Diklat Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai. Jurnal KBP, Vol. 2, No. 1.

    Kaswan. (2013). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

    Kirkpatrick, J.D. & Kirkpatrick, W.K. (2016). Based on the groundbreaking work of Donald L.Kirkpatrick: Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, USA: ATD Press.

    Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. (2003). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

    Passmore, J., dan Velez, M. J. (2014). Training Evaluation. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement, 136–153.

    Peraturan Kepala Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Nomor 82/PER/B5/2011 Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Perwakilan Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Provinsi. 9 Mei 2011. Jakarta.

    Rafiq, M. (2015). Training Evaluation in an Organization using Kirkpatrick Model: A Case Study of PIA. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, Vol. 04 (03).

    Suardipa, I. P. & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Peran Desain Evaluasi Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Widyacarya, Vol. 4, No. 2.

    Suwatno dan Donni Juni Priansa. (2014). Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis, Cetakan Keempat. Bandung: Alfabeta.

    Usman, N. (2012). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Kinerja Guru, Konsep, Teori, dan Model. Citapustaka Media Perintis: Bandung.

    Van Breukelen GJ. (2013). ANCOVA versus CHANGE from baseline in nonrandomized studies: the difference. Multivariate Behav Res.Vol. 48:895–922.

    William & Hita. (2019). Mengukur Tingkat Pemahaman Pelatihan PowerPoint Menggunakan Quasi-Experiment One-Group Pretest-Posttest. Jurnal SIFO Mikroskil, Vol. 20, No. 1.

    Zillah, F., Husniati, R., & Aziz, A. (2022). Pengaruh Pelatihan, Pengawasan, dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 3(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v3i1.677.

  1. Aguinis H, Kraiger K. (2009). Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organization and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 60: 451-474.
  2. Anthony, W. P., Kacmar, K. M., & Perrewe, P. L. (2010). Human Resource Management: A Strategic Approach. Cengage Learning: USA.
  3. Astuti, R., & Sari, I. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Kemasindo Cepat Nusantara Medan. Seminar Nasional Royal, 1(1), 461–464.
  4. Chang, R., dan Little, T. D. (2018). Innovations for Evaluation Research: Multiform Protocols, Visual Analog Scaling, and the Retrospective Pretest–Posttest Design. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 41(2), 246–269.
  5. Delucchi, M. (2014). Measuring Student Learning in Social Statistics. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 42(3), 231–239.
  6. Estrada, E., Ferrer, E., & Pardo, A. (2019). Statistics for Evaluating Pre-post Change: Relation Between Change in the Distribution Center and Change in the Individual Scores. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
  7. Fitriyah, R. N. (2017). Kajian Evaluasi Pasca-Diklat dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Penyelenggaraan Diklat. Semarang.
  8. Halawi, A., & Haydar, N. (2018). Effects of Training on Employee Performance: A Case Study of Bonjus and Khatib&Alami Companies. Business Economics and Tourism, 5(2), 59.
  9. Henryanto. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Peserta Diklat dari Kualitas Pelayanan Diklat Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai. Jurnal KBP, Vol. 2, No. 1.
  10. Kaswan. (2013). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  11. Kirkpatrick, J.D. & Kirkpatrick, W.K. (2016). Based on the groundbreaking work of Donald L.Kirkpatrick: Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, USA: ATD Press.
  12. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. (2003). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  13. Passmore, J., dan Velez, M. J. (2014). Training Evaluation. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement, 136–153.
  14. Peraturan Kepala Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Nomor 82/PER/B5/2011 Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Perwakilan Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Provinsi. 9 Mei 2011. Jakarta.
  15. Rafiq, M. (2015). Training Evaluation in an Organization using Kirkpatrick Model: A Case Study of PIA. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, Vol. 04 (03).
  16. Suardipa, I. P. & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Peran Desain Evaluasi Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Widyacarya, Vol. 4, No. 2.
  17. Suwatno dan Donni Juni Priansa. (2014). Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis, Cetakan Keempat. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  18. Usman, N. (2012). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Kinerja Guru, Konsep, Teori, dan Model. Citapustaka Media Perintis: Bandung.
  19. Van Breukelen GJ. (2013). ANCOVA versus CHANGE from baseline in nonrandomized studies: the difference. Multivariate Behav Res.Vol. 48:895–922.
  20. William & Hita. (2019). Mengukur Tingkat Pemahaman Pelatihan PowerPoint Menggunakan Quasi-Experiment One-Group Pretest-Posttest. Jurnal SIFO Mikroskil, Vol. 20, No. 1.
  21. Zillah, F., Husniati, R., & Aziz, A. (2022). Pengaruh Pelatihan, Pengawasan, dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 3(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v3i1.677.