Purpose: This study to explain the implementation of the liability of the application of the liability of the certificate of fitness for the functions of buildings based on Law No. 28 of 2002 on buildings in Pangkalan Kerincsi District, Pelalawan regency. Method: This study is a sociological legal research with empirical approach. Result: The application of the certificate of eligibility for building functions based on Law No.28 of 2002 on building in Pangkalan Kerinci District Pelalawan regency did not run effectively due to: first, the implementation resources in other words lack of experts. Secondly, the facilities that support its enforcement do not yet exist. Third, the lack of public awareness. Constraints on the implementation of the certificate of eligibility for building functions based on Law No. 28 year 2002 about buildings in the District of Pangkalan Kerinci Pelalawan author caused because: first, because of the lack of seriousness of the government. Second, the implementation resources have not been adequate in other words the shortage of experts. Third, the enforcement facility does not yet exist. Fourth, public awareness is still not maximized. Fifth, the public does not understand and understand the importance of building function certificate. Limitations: This study only occurred in the Pelalawan regency of Riau province. Contribution: This research is expected to be useful for the Pelalawan Government, especially related agencies and all people who need knowledge or information about the application of building function certificates.

Article 45A paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 states that any person who intentionally and without rights spreads false and misleading news that results in consumer losses in Electronic Transactions shall be punished with imprisonment and/or or fines. The fraud that occurred at One Mall Batam carried out through fake or fictitious electronic transactions cost the victim a total of 30 million rupiah. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation of criminal law against perpetrators of fraud through electronic payments in order to realize legal protection. And to find out the implementation, constraint factors and solutions in preventing and overcoming the rise of fraud in electronic payments. This research method is empirical juridical. Methodology: This research consists of literature study and is also supported by field studies through interviews with respondents. Results: The results of the study indicate that the regulation of criminal law against criminals through electronic payments in realizing legal protection, namely Article 378 of the Criminal Code which regulates special crimes, is also specifically regulated in Article 28 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 45A paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which regulates criminal acts of fraud committed through electronic transactions and is subject to a maximum criminal penalty of 6 (six) years and/or a maximum fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000 ,00 (one billion rupiah). Implementation in preventing and overcoming the rise of fraud in electronic payments is carried out by optimally criminalizing the perpetrators of crimes committed through electronic transactions. Limitations: The constraint factor faced is that there are many types of electronic transactions that cannot be reported directly, making it easier to ensure the results of daily reports. Contribution: The solution is that the victim must be more careful in accepting every payment through an electronic transaction, the victim must have the equipment to verify the proof of the electronic payment. It is recommended for law enforcement officers to optimize the performance of law enforcement for electronic transactions and dismantle tricks or methods applied by perpetrators to prevent other victims, victims to be more careful and thorough in accepting electronic transactions and must ensure first in advance of any payments made.

Purpose: The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the diversion arrangements at the level of investigation of children who commit narcotic crimes, and find out the rights violated in investigations and efforts to protect the law against children who commit narcotic crimes. Methodology: The method used is a normative approach, namely through the study of legislation and literature, and the empirical approach is through field research by conducting a series of interviews with respondents and informants to obtain field data. Results: The results of the study show that the regulation of diversion at the level of investigation of children who commit narcotics crimes means that there is absolute authority from investigators to carry out diversion efforts against children who commit narcotic crimes, but of all the cases handled so far none of the diversion attempts have been successful. applied. The rights that are violated in the investigation of children who commit narcotics crimes are that the investigator does not prioritize the principle of the best interests of the child, the investigator does not provide legal assistance and other assistance, the investigator does not ask for expert opinion in carrying out the investigation, and does not notify the right to obtain legal assistance. Efforts to protect the law against children who commit criminal acts of narcotics abuse in investigations, namely asking parents and Community Advisors to accompany children during the investigation process, provide guidance to children while undergoing a period of detention at the investigative level, and complete the investigation process within a time limit of 7 (seven) days with an extension of 8 (eight) days.