Konstruksi Pengaturan Penyidikan terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Berkeadilan

https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v5i1.4379
Published: Jul 11, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the regulatory framework for investigating criminal acts committed by medical personnel from a justice-based perspective, particularly under Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. It also seeks to identify procedural weaknesses and their implications for the legal protection of medical professionals.

Methodology: Using a normative legal approach, this research examines the 1945 Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code, and Law No. 17 of 2023. Legal materials were obtained through literature review involving primary (laws and court decisions), secondary (academic books and journals), and tertiary sources (legal dictionaries). The data were analyzed through legal interpretation, comparison, and normative argumentation, focusing on professional ethics, institutional authority, and justice principles.

Results/Findings: The study finds inconsistencies in how investigations involving medical personnel are regulated. The Medical Disciplinary Panel (MDP) is often misinterpreted as having investigative authority rather than acting as a professional advisor. Coordination gaps between medical and legal institutions weaken procedural fairness and protection. A more just framework requires clarity on institutional roles and the protection of both public interests and professionals’ rights.

Conclusions: A fair investigation framework must redefine the MDP’s role, enhance inter-agency coordination, and ensure balanced mechanisms aligned with justice.

Limitations: This research is limited to doctrinal legal analysis and does not incorporate empirical data or socio-cultural perspectives.

Contributions: This study proposes a justice-oriented model for handling legal cases involving medical personnel, reinforcing legal certainty, institutional synergy, and the balance between ethical standards and criminal accountability.

Keywords:
1. Criminal investigation
2. Legal protection
3. Professional ethics
4. Law Number 17 of 2023
5. Medical personnel
6. investigation, Medical Personnel, Professional Disciplinary Council
Authors:
Gregorius Yoga Panji Asmara
View PDF
How to Cite
Panji Asmara, G. Y. (2025). Konstruksi Pengaturan Penyidikan terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Berkeadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v5i1.4379
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Adrianto, R., Rahayu, E. P., Sumarni, S., Ar, C., & Isnaniah, E. (2025). Pelatihan Manajemen Puskesmas Dengan Metode 3P di Puskesmas Sempaja Kota Samarinda ( Training of 3P Primary Healthcare Management in Puskesmas Sempaja Samarinda City ). 5(4), 811–818. Https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v5i4.3839

    Aisyah, A., Azharuddin, A., Rizal, S., & Zulkifli, S. (2022). Studi Perbandingan Alat Bukti Saksi dalam KUHAP dan KUHAP Islam. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan, 1(1), 1–11. Https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i1.1338

    Aisyah Fajri, F. (2020). Kit Eksperimen Sel Volta Inquiry Based Worksheet Development On Selvolta Experiment Kit. 2.

    Atmosudirdjo, P. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Ghalia.

    Friedman, L. M. (2015). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (terjemahan). Nusa Media, Bandung.

    Fubby Lofus, R. (2019). Hak dan Kewajiban Pejabat Pemerintah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, VII(1), 5–16.

    Hadiyati, I., Sekarwana, N., Sunjaya, D. K., & Setiawati, E. P. (2017). Konsep Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan berdasar atas Ekspektasi Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Majalah Kedokteran Bandung, 49(2), 102–109. Https://doi.org/10.15395/mkb.v49n2.1054

    Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (1981).

    Kristiana, Y. (2006). Independensi kejaksaan dalam penyidikan. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

    Kusumaatmadja, M. (1986). Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Bina Cipta.

    Latif, A. (2014). Hukum Administrasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Prenada media Group.

    Maulana, I., Rohim, A., Budiono, A. N., & Madura, U. T. (2024). Optimalisasi Kewenangan Keuangan Desa Optimalisasi Kewenangan Keuangan Desa Berdasarkan Uu Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 Dalam. 2(11).

    Nur, S., & Susanto, H. (2020). Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan. Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 3(3), 2621–2781. Https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i3.430 - 441

    Nurmayani. (2009). Hukum Administrasi Daerah. Universitas Lampung.

    Parameshwara, P., & Riza, K. (2023). Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Konteks Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(1), 25-34. doi:10.35912/jasmi.v1i1.1973

    Perkasa, A., & Pakpahan, K. (2023). Kebijakan Penegak Hukum Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Melalui Media Elektronik Di Indonesia. Sibatik Journal, 2(7), 2067–2084. Https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i7.1113

    Pradana, K. C., Rizki Putra, A., & Rahmawati, Y. (2022). Ethnomathematics on Traditional Culture: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review on Database Scopus. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 1(1), 1–8. Https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v1i1.61

    Putri, A. K., & Layang, I. W. B. S. (2022). Pengaturan Due Process of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Guna. Kertadesa, 10(10).

    Ramadhani. D, A. N., Shafira, M., Dewi, E., Jatmiko, G., & Warganegara, D. (2024). Implementasi Perluasan Makna Asas Legalitas Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 65–74. Https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i2.2529

    Resopijani, A., & Neonbeni, Y. B. (2024). Ethical violation by the Chairman of the Constitutional Court against Indonesian law and democracy. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(3), 401–408. Https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v1i3.2147

    Ridwan, H. (2013). Hukum Administrasi Negara. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

    Saragih, A. (2018). Peran Sipir Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Antar Sesama Narapidana. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan, 6(1).

    Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Kewenangan Kreditor Mengajukan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Honeste Vivere, 33(1), 69–76. Https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i1.193

    Thayer, J. B. (1898). A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law. Little, Brown, and Company.

    Utrecht, E. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Ichtiar Baru.

    Widodo, S. (2025). Criminological analysis of narcotics crime verdicts committed by members of the military ( Study of Military Court Decisions ). 4(1), 17–32. Https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v4i1.2982

  1. Adrianto, R., Rahayu, E. P., Sumarni, S., Ar, C., & Isnaniah, E. (2025). Pelatihan Manajemen Puskesmas Dengan Metode 3P di Puskesmas Sempaja Kota Samarinda ( Training of 3P Primary Healthcare Management in Puskesmas Sempaja Samarinda City ). 5(4), 811–818. Https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v5i4.3839
  2. Aisyah, A., Azharuddin, A., Rizal, S., & Zulkifli, S. (2022). Studi Perbandingan Alat Bukti Saksi dalam KUHAP dan KUHAP Islam. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan, 1(1), 1–11. Https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i1.1338
  3. Aisyah Fajri, F. (2020). Kit Eksperimen Sel Volta Inquiry Based Worksheet Development On Selvolta Experiment Kit. 2.
  4. Atmosudirdjo, P. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Ghalia.
  5. Friedman, L. M. (2015). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (terjemahan). Nusa Media, Bandung.
  6. Fubby Lofus, R. (2019). Hak dan Kewajiban Pejabat Pemerintah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, VII(1), 5–16.
  7. Hadiyati, I., Sekarwana, N., Sunjaya, D. K., & Setiawati, E. P. (2017). Konsep Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan berdasar atas Ekspektasi Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Majalah Kedokteran Bandung, 49(2), 102–109. Https://doi.org/10.15395/mkb.v49n2.1054
  8. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (1981).
  9. Kristiana, Y. (2006). Independensi kejaksaan dalam penyidikan. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
  10. Kusumaatmadja, M. (1986). Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Bina Cipta.
  11. Latif, A. (2014). Hukum Administrasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Prenada media Group.
  12. Maulana, I., Rohim, A., Budiono, A. N., & Madura, U. T. (2024). Optimalisasi Kewenangan Keuangan Desa Optimalisasi Kewenangan Keuangan Desa Berdasarkan Uu Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 Dalam. 2(11).
  13. Nur, S., & Susanto, H. (2020). Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan. Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 3(3), 2621–2781. Https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i3.430 - 441
  14. Nurmayani. (2009). Hukum Administrasi Daerah. Universitas Lampung.
  15. Parameshwara, P., & Riza, K. (2023). Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Konteks Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(1), 25-34. doi:10.35912/jasmi.v1i1.1973
  16. Perkasa, A., & Pakpahan, K. (2023). Kebijakan Penegak Hukum Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perjudian Melalui Media Elektronik Di Indonesia. Sibatik Journal, 2(7), 2067–2084. Https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i7.1113
  17. Pradana, K. C., Rizki Putra, A., & Rahmawati, Y. (2022). Ethnomathematics on Traditional Culture: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review on Database Scopus. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 1(1), 1–8. Https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v1i1.61
  18. Putri, A. K., & Layang, I. W. B. S. (2022). Pengaturan Due Process of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Guna. Kertadesa, 10(10).
  19. Ramadhani. D, A. N., Shafira, M., Dewi, E., Jatmiko, G., & Warganegara, D. (2024). Implementasi Perluasan Makna Asas Legalitas Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 65–74. Https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i2.2529
  20. Resopijani, A., & Neonbeni, Y. B. (2024). Ethical violation by the Chairman of the Constitutional Court against Indonesian law and democracy. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(3), 401–408. Https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v1i3.2147
  21. Ridwan, H. (2013). Hukum Administrasi Negara. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  22. Saragih, A. (2018). Peran Sipir Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Antar Sesama Narapidana. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan, 6(1).
  23. Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Kewenangan Kreditor Mengajukan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Honeste Vivere, 33(1), 69–76. Https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i1.193
  24. Thayer, J. B. (1898). A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law. Little, Brown, and Company.
  25. Utrecht, E. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Ichtiar Baru.
  26. Widodo, S. (2025). Criminological analysis of narcotics crime verdicts committed by members of the military ( Study of Military Court Decisions ). 4(1), 17–32. Https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v4i1.2982