JBPD

Article Details

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Juli

Articles

The Practice of QRIS Usage in Traditional Vegetable Vendor Transactions: An Ethnomethodological Approach for Payments

N Nur Rahma W Wa Ode Rayyani
Abstract
19 Jul 2025

Purpose: This study examines the internal logic and daily practices that traditional vegetable vendors use when adopting the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) payment system, viewed through social methods that sustain the people's economy in the digital era.
Methodology: A qualitative field study employing an ethnomethodological approach was conducted. Primary data were collected through in depth interviews and participant observation of vegetable vendors operating in a traditional market. Data analysis followed four stages, namely indexicality analysis, reflexivity analysis, conceptual action analysis, and the presentation of common sense knowledge.
Results: Vendors interpret the QRIS sticker as an index of modernity that signals service readiness to younger, cash averse buyers. Through reflexive accounts, vendors justify QRIS use as a practical solution to the classic problems of providing small change and accepting counterfeit currency, even though delayed fund settlement and unstable market internet connections continue to constrain daily capital liquidity.
Conclusions: QRIS improves the transparency and operational efficiency of micro enterprises, yet its integration remains complementary rather than substitutive, since the market ecosystem still rests on social capital and interpersonal trust.
Limitations: Findings are contextually bound to a single commodity group and cannot be statistically generalized.
Contributions: The study offers regulators and financial institutions an insider perspective for designing contextually adaptive digital infrastructure and outreach programs.

Keywords: Digital Payment Ethnomethodology QRIS Traditional Market Vegetable Vendors
How to Cite
Rahma, N. ., & Rayyani, W. O. . (2025). The Practice of QRIS Usage in Traditional Vegetable Vendor Transactions: An Ethnomethodological Approach for Payments. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Pemasaran Digital, 5(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.35912/jbpd.v5i1.7054
References
  1. Adzim, K. F. (2025). Optimalisasi penerapan sistem pembayaran digital melalui QRIS pada street food Stadion Maulana Yusuf di Banten. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 3(2), 338-351.
  2. Al Hawari, M., Bataineh, A., & Alshurideh, M. (2022). Go cashless! Mobile payment apps acceptance in developing countries: The Jordanian context perspective. Sustainability, 14(20), 13524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013524
  3. Anggraini, F., Laily, D. W., & Khomah, I. (2025). Persepsi pedagang bahan pokok terhadap penggunaan QRIS di pasar tradisional Pucang Anom Surabaya. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 11(2), 2261-2267.
  4. Annisa, N. N., Irwanah, L., Rosa, N. I., Nasution, C. D. A. A., Ranggika, R., & Karimah, S. A. B. (2024). Implementasi QRIS metode pembayaran digital pada kualitas peningkatan UMKM di masyarakat Desa Rancabungur. PRAXIS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 97-104.
  5. Ardana, S. G., Luqyana, A. S., Antono, I. A. L., Rahayu, R. P., Qonita, L., Zahra, S. A., & Alsyahdat, F. (2023). Efektifitas penggunaan QRIS bagi kalangan mahasiswa UNNES untuk transaksi pembayaran dalam rangka mendorong perkembangan ekonomi pada era digitalisasi. Jurnal Potensial, 2(2), 167-183.
  6. Ariyani, N. I., & Nurcahyono, O. H. (2021). Digitalisasi pasar tradisional: Perspektif teori perubahan sosial. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i1.48576
  7. Aswan, L. S., Fauzi, R. A., & Ermawati, W. J. (2026). Digital payment transformation and its impact on bank performance and stability: The case of Indonesia's QRIS adoption. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Airlangga, 36(1), 1-15.
  8. Aulia, A., & Helmi, R. F. (2026). Persepsi pedagang terhadap program Pasar SIAP QRIS di Pasar Tradisional Sicincin, Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 1-11.
  9. Ayati, N., Siswanto, Martini, M., & Haerunnisak. (2025). Analisis interaksi pedagang dan lembaga keuangan dalam konteks kearifan lokal di pasar tradisional (Studi etnometodologi di Pasar Landungsari). Oikos: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(2), 800-811.
  10. Bakhitah, A., Indra, R., Halim, W., Ferbian, V., & Hidayat, Z. (2023). QRIS as a driver of product distribution flows in Indonesia: Factors of consumer purchasing behavior in the use of fintech payments. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(12), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.12.202312.59
  11. Dieu, H. T. M., Al Mamun, A., Nguyen, T. L. H., & Naznen, F. (2023). Cashless Vietnam: A study on intention and adoption of cashless payment. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2022-0031
  12. Ekow Kelly, A. Y., & Palaniappan, S. (2023). Using a technology acceptance model to determine factors influencing continued usage of mobile money service transactions in Ghana. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00301-3
  13. Farhan, A., & Shifa, A. W. (2023). Penggunaan metode pembayaran QRIS pada setiap UMKM di era digital. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara (JPkMN), 4(2), 1198-1206.
  14. Handayani, N. L. P., & Soeparan, P. F. (2022). Peran sistem pembayaran digital dalam revitalisasi UMKM. Jurnal Mahasiswa, 4(3), 238-250.
  15. Handayani, S., Syadad, H. H., & Muhibah, S. F. (2025). Pedagang pasar tradisional di era digital: Apa yang dilakukan pemerintah daerah untuk mereka agar kompetitif? JSHP: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.32487/jshp.v9i1.2145
  16. Handayani, L., & Yusuf, S. (2023). Pendampingan dalam implementasi QRIS bagi UMKM dan pedagang pasar tradisional. Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat, 11(1), 95-108.
  17. Jawad, A. I., Parvin, T., & Hosain, M. S. (2022). Intention to adopt mobile based online payment platforms in three Asian countries: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 5(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-08-2021-0030
  18. Khoiroh, S. F., & Agustianto, M. A. (2025). Tantangan dan peluang implementasi cashless society: Systematic literature review pada sektor UMKM. Indonesian Journal of Management Science, 4(2), 109-122.
  19. Meier zu Verl, C., & Meyer, C. (2024). Ethnomethodological ethnography: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations. Qualitative Research, 24(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221129798
  20. Mufidah, A., & Jamillah, K. (2026). Peningkatan literasi keuangan digital melalui edukasi manfaat dan risiko penggunaan QRIS bagi pelaku UMKM di Kecamatan Patrang Jember. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Akademisi, 5(2), 53-58.
  21. Natsir, K., Bangun, N., Attan, M. B., & Landias, J. S. (2023). Penggunaan QRIS sebagai alat pembayaran digital untuk meningkatkan produktivitas UMKM. Jurnal Serina Abdimas, 1(3), 1154-1163.
  22. Nugrahini, E., Jannah, S. R., & Prastiwi, A. (2023). Analisa persepsi dan intensi penggunaan e-money pada pedagang pasar tradisional Kota Malang. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 11(3), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v11i3.53271
  23. Nurhapsari, R., & Sholihah, E. (2022). Analysis of the factors of intention to use QRIS for MSMEs in Semarang City's traditional market. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 18(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.21067/jem.v18i2.7291
  24. Pameling, D. P., Sari, G., Faradea, N., & Hendra K, J. (2024). Pengaruh pasar modern terhadap pasar tradisional di era digital. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7(4), 16218-16223.
  25. Puspitaningrum, F., Kusumastuti, S. C., & Rimbawati, A. (2023). Penggunaan QRIS dalam transaksi jual beli di tengah masyarakat UMKM Ketintang Surabaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 603-614.
  26. Putra, D., & Rahman, A. (2023). Percepatan implementasi digital payment pada UMKM: Intensi pengguna QRIS berdasarkan technology acceptance model. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v12i1.52480
  27. Putrevu, J., & Mertzanis, C. (2024). The adoption of digital payments in emerging economies: Challenges and policy responses. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 26(5), 484-503. http s://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2023-0173
  28. Putri, W. E., Rarawahyuni, I., Sukarnoto, T., & Paramole, I. B. (2025). The influence of lifestyle, cashless society and residential location on the intention to use QRIS as a payment tool. Ecobankers: Journal of Economy and Banking, 6(1), 10-21.
  29. Saputra, A. B., Hermawan, A., & Maesaroh, S. S. (2024). Analisis dan rekomendasi upaya penerapan penggunaan QRIS bagi pedagang di Pasar Cikurubuk Tasikmalaya. JUTRABIDI, 1(5), 41-58.
  30. Soeprajitno, E. D., & Wihara, D. S. (2023). Pola integrasi kearifan lokal di pasar tradisional: Sebuah tinjauan fenomenologis kehidupan sosial ekonomi pedagang kaki lima sayuran di Kota Kediri. Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Terapan (PENATARAN), 8(2), 222-234.
  31. Tian, Y., & Chan, T. J. (2024). Predictors of mobile payment use applications from the extended technology acceptance model: Does self-efficacy and trust matter? SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241292525
  32. Utomo, F. S., Suryana, N., & Azmi, M. S. (2025). Factors influencing user adoption of mobile payment system: An integrated model of perceived usefulness, ease of use, financial literacy, and trust. Journal of Digital Market and Digital Currency, 2(1), 1-14.
  33. Wibawa, I. G. J. S., Aryawati, N. P. A., & Mahardika, I. M. N. O. (2022). Persepsi pengguna QRIS pada UMKM di Kota Mataram. Guna Sewaka, 1(2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.53977/jgs.v1i2.668
License & Copyright