Makna Tradisi “ Pemacakhan “ pada Upacara Pernikahan Masyarakat Lampung Adat Saibatin Pekon Way Kerap, Kecamatan Semaka, Kabupaten Tanggamus, Lampung: Pendekatan Etnografi Komunikasi

Published: Mar 6, 2023

Abstract:

Purpose: "Pemacakhan" is a habit carried out by the people of Lampung Saibatine specially the Kepaksian Semaka community during the wedding ceremony procession, this tradition is a form of appreciation for the Traditional Head, skipper and extended family to the bride and groom and also pray for the good of their household and share in the happiness of the marriage.

Research Methodology: In this study, researchers used qualitative research methods and used ethnographic communication research analysis. By using this method, researchers can provide an overview, explain, and associate each category with the data found.

Result: Components of communication contained in the tradition" pemacakahan ", communication that takes place is more non-verbal communication. This non-verbal communication is contained in the tools and materials used in the procession of "Pemacakhan". The equipment and materials used in this procession are henna leaves, yellow rice, water mixed with talcum powder and banana leaves. All the equipment and materials used have good meaning and philosophy for the lives of the bride and groom, namely containing a prayer and hope for the extended family for their second household.

Contribution: This research is expected to provide benefits for the development of communication science, especially in the ethnographic theory of communication, and can provide understanding to the public about the meaning of carrying out processionspemacakahan Lampung Saibatin tradition.

Limitations: Data collection techniques used to obtain data in this study were interviews and documentation.

Keywords:
1. “Pemacakhan“ Tradition
2. Saibatin Tradition
3. Ethnography of Communication
Authors:
Reni Susanti
How to Cite
Susanti, R. . (2023). Makna Tradisi “ Pemacakhan “ pada Upacara Pernikahan Masyarakat Lampung Adat Saibatin Pekon Way Kerap, Kecamatan Semaka, Kabupaten Tanggamus, Lampung: Pendekatan Etnografi Komunikasi . Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 2(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v2i2.1807

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
References

    Azhar, A., & Bengkel, B. (2022). Strategi Bertahan Hidup Pengemudi Ojek Online Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Kota Matsum II Medan. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(1), 13-23. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i1.1486

    Carbaugh, D. (2015). Ethnography of communication. Researching Translation and Interpreting, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i4.4959

    Danang Tandyonomanu1, T. B. (2013). Seni Ruang Dan Waktu Dalam Mappacci Pada Upaca- Ra Perkawinan Adat Bugis. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 1(No. 1), 83–94.

    Darmawan, K. Z. (2008). Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi: Tipe dan Metode. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i1.1142

    Effendy, O. Uchjana. 2002. Ilmu Komunikasi dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

    Gempayani, Neti, Iskandar Syah, and Suparman Arif. "Tradisi Pemacakhan Pada

    Acara Perkawinan Adat Saibatin Di Pekon Sanggi." PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah) 3.6 (2015).

    Howell, S. (2005). The ethnography of moralities. The Ethnography of Moralities, 2(51), 1–235. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203974193

    Ike Junita Triwardhani Wulan Trigartanti Raditya Pratama Putra. (2020). Study of Communication Ethnography for Entrepreneurship Culture in the Interpersonal Relations of Teachers and Students. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1).

    Irawan, D. (2019). Studi Etnografi Komunikasi pada Organisasi Persatuan Islam. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v2i1.5057

    Kiki Zakiah. (2008). Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi: Tipe dan Metode. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 181–188.

    Korada, A., & Prayaga, S. (2017). Ethnography of Communication – a Study of Just Lather, That’S All. Global Journal of Arts, 5(8), 44–48.

    Littlejohn, S. W. & K. A. F. (2008). Theories of Human Communication, 9th ed. Belmont?:Thomson Wadsworth.

    Manas, R., & Chinmay, B. (2011). A study on Ethnography of communication: A discourse analysis with Hymes ‘speaking model.’ Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 33–40. www.iiste.org

    Meli Septania, Adelina Hasyim, H. Y. (2017). Implementasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dalam Proses Upacara Pernikahan Adat Lampung Sai Batin. Jurnal Kultur Demokrasi, 5(No. 5).

    Miranti, C. M. (2022). Analisis Semiotika Gaya Bahasa dalam Program Sie Reuboh LPP-RRi Banda Aceh. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 2(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v2i1.1205

    Noy, C. (2015). Ethnography of communication. Researching Translation and Interpreting, November 2017, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i4.4959

    Nugraha, A., Sinaga, O., & Dermawan, W. (2023). Kontradiksi Perilaku Republik Rakyat China di Asia Tenggara: Geopolitik dan Kepentingan Nasional. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(2), 101-112. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i2.1843

    Nurhadi , Zikri Fachrul, Ummu Salamah, dan Tria Vidiyanti.(2018). Etnografi Komunikasi Tradisi Siraman Pada Prosesi Pernikahan Adat Sunda. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, Vol. 21 No. 2, Desember 2018. Available from http://bppkibandung.id/index.php/jpk

    Putra, Asaas dan Shabrina Shanaz. (2018). Etnografi Komunikasi Pada Upacara Pernikahan Betawi. Jurnal Lingkar Studi Komunikasi, Vol. 4 No. 2, Bulan September 2018. Available from http://journals.telkomuniversity.ac.id/liski

    Rahman, R., & Octavia, V. (2023). Pola Interaksi Sosial di Warung (Studi Kasus pada Interaksi Sosial di Warung Sembako di Kelurahan Pulogebang Kota Jakarta Timur). Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(2), 131-141. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i2.1885

    Regiyati, S., & Rusli, Z. (2021). Strategi Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu dalam Meningkatkan Investasi di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v1i1.315

    Rifa’I, M. (2017). Etnografi Komunikasi Ritual Tingkeban Neloni dan Mitoni Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Bagi Etnis Jawa di Desa Sumbersuko Kecamatan Gempol kabupaten Pasuruan. Ettisal ( Jurnal of Communication ), Vol. 2, Nomer. 1, Juni 2017. Available from https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/ettisal

    Sari, Devita. Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam Dalam Upacara Busunat Dan Implementasinya Pada Budaya Lampung Saibatin. Diss. Uin Raden Intan Lampung

    Saville-troike, M. (2021). The ethnography of communication. In Routledge Library Editions: Sociolinguistics (Vols. 7–7). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429434679-8

    Witteborn, S., & Sprain, L. M. H. (2009). Grouping Processes in a Public Meeting from an Ethnography of Communication and Cultural Discourse Analysis Perspective. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.85

    Yan?k, B., & Ya?ar, M. (2018). An ethnographic approach to peer culture in a Turkish preschool classroom. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438139

  1. Azhar, A., & Bengkel, B. (2022). Strategi Bertahan Hidup Pengemudi Ojek Online Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Kota Matsum II Medan. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(1), 13-23. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i1.1486
  2. Carbaugh, D. (2015). Ethnography of communication. Researching Translation and Interpreting, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i4.4959
  3. Danang Tandyonomanu1, T. B. (2013). Seni Ruang Dan Waktu Dalam Mappacci Pada Upaca- Ra Perkawinan Adat Bugis. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 1(No. 1), 83–94.
  4. Darmawan, K. Z. (2008). Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi: Tipe dan Metode. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i1.1142
  5. Effendy, O. Uchjana. 2002. Ilmu Komunikasi dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  6. Gempayani, Neti, Iskandar Syah, and Suparman Arif. "Tradisi Pemacakhan Pada
  7. Acara Perkawinan Adat Saibatin Di Pekon Sanggi." PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah) 3.6 (2015).
  8. Howell, S. (2005). The ethnography of moralities. The Ethnography of Moralities, 2(51), 1–235. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203974193
  9. Ike Junita Triwardhani Wulan Trigartanti Raditya Pratama Putra. (2020). Study of Communication Ethnography for Entrepreneurship Culture in the Interpersonal Relations of Teachers and Students. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1).
  10. Irawan, D. (2019). Studi Etnografi Komunikasi pada Organisasi Persatuan Islam. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v2i1.5057
  11. Kiki Zakiah. (2008). Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi: Tipe dan Metode. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 181–188.
  12. Korada, A., & Prayaga, S. (2017). Ethnography of Communication – a Study of Just Lather, That’S All. Global Journal of Arts, 5(8), 44–48.
  13. Littlejohn, S. W. & K. A. F. (2008). Theories of Human Communication, 9th ed. Belmont?:Thomson Wadsworth.
  14. Manas, R., & Chinmay, B. (2011). A study on Ethnography of communication: A discourse analysis with Hymes ‘speaking model.’ Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 33–40. www.iiste.org
  15. Meli Septania, Adelina Hasyim, H. Y. (2017). Implementasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dalam Proses Upacara Pernikahan Adat Lampung Sai Batin. Jurnal Kultur Demokrasi, 5(No. 5).
  16. Miranti, C. M. (2022). Analisis Semiotika Gaya Bahasa dalam Program Sie Reuboh LPP-RRi Banda Aceh. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 2(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v2i1.1205
  17. Noy, C. (2015). Ethnography of communication. Researching Translation and Interpreting, November 2017, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i4.4959
  18. Nugraha, A., Sinaga, O., & Dermawan, W. (2023). Kontradiksi Perilaku Republik Rakyat China di Asia Tenggara: Geopolitik dan Kepentingan Nasional. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(2), 101-112. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i2.1843
  19. Nurhadi , Zikri Fachrul, Ummu Salamah, dan Tria Vidiyanti.(2018). Etnografi Komunikasi Tradisi Siraman Pada Prosesi Pernikahan Adat Sunda. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, Vol. 21 No. 2, Desember 2018. Available from http://bppkibandung.id/index.php/jpk
  20. Putra, Asaas dan Shabrina Shanaz. (2018). Etnografi Komunikasi Pada Upacara Pernikahan Betawi. Jurnal Lingkar Studi Komunikasi, Vol. 4 No. 2, Bulan September 2018. Available from http://journals.telkomuniversity.ac.id/liski
  21. Rahman, R., & Octavia, V. (2023). Pola Interaksi Sosial di Warung (Studi Kasus pada Interaksi Sosial di Warung Sembako di Kelurahan Pulogebang Kota Jakarta Timur). Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 2(2), 131-141. doi:10.35912/jasispol.v2i2.1885
  22. Regiyati, S., & Rusli, Z. (2021). Strategi Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu dalam Meningkatkan Investasi di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v1i1.315
  23. Rifa’I, M. (2017). Etnografi Komunikasi Ritual Tingkeban Neloni dan Mitoni Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Bagi Etnis Jawa di Desa Sumbersuko Kecamatan Gempol kabupaten Pasuruan. Ettisal ( Jurnal of Communication ), Vol. 2, Nomer. 1, Juni 2017. Available from https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/ettisal
  24. Sari, Devita. Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam Dalam Upacara Busunat Dan Implementasinya Pada Budaya Lampung Saibatin. Diss. Uin Raden Intan Lampung
  25. Saville-troike, M. (2021). The ethnography of communication. In Routledge Library Editions: Sociolinguistics (Vols. 7–7). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429434679-8
  26. Witteborn, S., & Sprain, L. M. H. (2009). Grouping Processes in a Public Meeting from an Ethnography of Communication and Cultural Discourse Analysis Perspective. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.85
  27. Yan?k, B., & Ya?ar, M. (2018). An ethnographic approach to peer culture in a Turkish preschool classroom. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438139