Jakman

Article Details

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Maret

Articles

Effect of Leverage, Fiscal Distress, and Fiscal Capacity on COVID-19 Accrual Manipulation

N Neni Yusmita S Sandrayati Sandrayati O Okky Savira S Sopiyan AR
10 March 2026 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Maret https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i2.5607
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the effects of leverage, fiscal distress, and fiscal capacity on accrual manipulation in provincial governments in Indonesia during 2020–2022.

Methodology/approach: The research data used regional government financial reports audited by the Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), with a sample size of 102 observations from 34 provinces over three years. The analysis method used was panel data regression with a Random Effects Model (REM) approach.

Results: The results show that leverage has no significant effect on accrual manipulation. Conversely, fiscal distress and fiscal capacity have a positive effect on accrual manipulation, indicating that high fiscal pressure and capacity encourage accounting flexibility to maintain the image and meet performance targets. Simultaneously, leverage, fiscal distress, and fiscal capacity contribute to the level of accrual manipulation by local governments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: This study concludes that fiscal distress and fiscal capacity significantly influence accrual manipulation among Indonesian provincial governments during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas leverage has no effect. High fiscal pressure and capacity encourage accounting discretion to maintain the performance. Strengthening fiscal governance and audit oversight is essential for reducing the risk of manipulation in public financial reporting.

Limitations: The limitations of alternative indicators and objects to districts/cities.

Contributions: These findings have important implications for local governments in strengthening financial governance, auditors in increasing oversight of accrual items vulnerable to manipulation, and future researchers in expanding the variables and scope of research.

Keywords: Accrual Manipulation Covid-19 Pandemic Fiscal Capacity Fiscal Distres Leverage
How to Cite
“
Yusmita, N., Sandrayati, S., Savira, O., & AR, S. (2026). Effect of Leverage, Fiscal Distress, and Fiscal Capacity on COVID-19 Accrual Manipulation. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i2.5607
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. References
  2. Abdullah, S., Handayani, H., & Darwanis, D. (2022). Determinan Manipulasi Akrual Dalam Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 12(2), 275-291. doi:https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.21502
  3. Abdullah, S., & Junita, A. (2020). Determinan kinerja anggaran pada organisasi perangkat daerah. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 109-124. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v13i1.14953
  4. Adnan, A., Abdullah, S., & Kamal, M. (2023). Accrual Management in the Local Government Of Aceh: An Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics, 6(1), 63-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v6i1.32059
  5. Algifari, A., Subiyakto, H., & Rohman, I. Z. (2024). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the country's national economy: The Indonesian experience. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 4(1), 61-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v4i1.1550
  6. Arcas, M. J., & Martí, C. (2016). Financial performance adjustment in English local governments. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 141-152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12094
  7. Baskaran, T., & Bigsten, A. (2013). Fiscal capacity and the quality of government in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 45, 92-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.09.018
  8. Cohen, S., Bisogno, M., & Malkogianni, I. (2019). Earnings management in local governments: the role of political factors. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(3), 331-348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2018-0162
  9. Ferreira, A., Carvalho, J., & Pinho, F. (2013). Earnings management around zero: a motivation to local politician signalling competence. Public Management Review, 15(5), 657-686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.707679
  10. Gamayuni, R. (2022). Motivation and Abnormal Accrual Characteristics On Financial Statements of Local Governments In Indonesia. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 19(2), 969-991.
  11. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  12. Goddard, A., & Issa Mzenzi, S. (2015). Accounting practices in Tanzanian local government authorities: towards a grounded theory of manipulating legitimacy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-356320150000015005
  13. Gunawan, T., & Mappadang, A. (2024). The effect of capital intensity, leverage, liquidity, moderated by company size on tax agressiveness (Empirical study on energy companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2018-2022 period). Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(3), 305-321. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v1i3.2117
  14. Hardianto, A. M., Sari, D. P., & Leviany, T. (2023). Transformasi Dewan Direksi Perusahaan BUMN melalui Pendekatan Perilaku Akuntansi Guna Antisipasi Resesi Global. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 4(2), 129-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v4i2.1596
  15. Ishak, J. F. (2024). The role of earnings quality in the impact of earnings management and leverage on firm value. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(4), 433-442. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v5i4.1204
  16. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
  17. Kumar, S. (2024). Is depreciation fraud detectable using ADTFA and DAAT financial models? A case study. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(4), 473-488. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v5i4.1624
  18. Maher, C. S., Oh, J. W., & Liao, W.-J. (2020). Assessing fiscal distress in small county governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(4), 691-711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0016
  19. Makruf, M. R. (2024). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Kejelasan Sasaran dan Desentralisasi terhadap Kinerja Manajerial di Kota Mojokerto. Studi Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 79-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/sekp.v2i2.2775
  20. Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Jameson Boex, L. (2011). Fiscal capacity: an overview of concepts and measurement issues and their applicability in the Russian Federation. GSU Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper, 97(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.470821
  21. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public economics, 69(2), 263-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
  22. Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 3(4), 305-360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341280.0038
  23. Meisi, I., & Syukriy, A. (2026). Determinants Of Accrual Manipulation In Local Government Financial Reporting: Empirical Evidence From The Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Budget : Isu dan Masalah Keuangan Negara, 10(2).
  24. Nazikha, R. S., & Rahmawati, F. (2021). Pengaruh desentralisasi fiskal, kapasitas fiskal daerah, dan elastisitas fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan inklusif Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Pendidikan (JEBP), 1(2), 120-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.17977/um066v1i22021p120-134
  25. Putri, M., Abdullah, S., Adnan, A., & Yusmita, F. (2023). Manipulasi Akrual Dalam Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia: Apakah Government Size Dan Kapasitas Fiskal Memiliki Efek? Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 8(4), 536-544. doi:https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v8i4.24314
  26. Ramdani, D., & Prayitno, Y. H. (2023). The leverage and company size impact on delay in the audit. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(3), 265-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v5i3.397
  27. Ridhwan, A., & Dwiati, A. R. (2022). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kebijakan Dividen. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 3(3), 195-206.
  28. Rohman, A., Daud, R., & Ubaidillah, U. (2018). Analisis pengaruh laporan hasil pemeriksaan, diskresi akrual dan tingkatan akrual terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah. Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah dan Perpajakan, 11(3), 486-512. doi:https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.22441/profita.2018.v11.03.009
  29. Shafira, C. A., & Abdullah, S. (2022). Pengaruh Sisa Lebih Perhitungan Anggaran (SiLPA) dan Financial Distress terhadap Manipulasi Akrual pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 7(3), 348-358. doi:https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v7i3.20574
  30. Tampubolon, L., Dewata, E., Indriasari, D., & Jauhari, H. (2023). Pengaruh Government Size, Fiscal Distress, dan Sisa Lebih Perhitungan Anggaran Terhadap Manipulasi Akrual. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 21(2), 104-118. doi:https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v21i2.10910
  31. Trussel, J. M., & Patrick, P. A. (2009). A predictive model of fiscal distress in local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(4), 578-616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-21-04-2009-b004
  32. Uttunggadewi, S. K. M., Martini, R., & Aryani, Y. A. (2024). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Manipulasi Akrual : Studi Pada Kabupaten/Kota Sumatera Selatan. EKOBIS : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 1915-2065. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36596/ekobis.v12i2.1689
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.