Jakman

Article Details

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Juni

Articles

Auditing Climate-Related Risk: Challenges to Auditor Independence and Professional Skepticism

E Edy Susanto T Tenriwaru Tenriwaru U Ummu Kalsum
08 June 2026 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Juni https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i3.6350
Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how climate-related risk is identified and assessed in financial statement audits and analyzes its implications for auditor independence and professional skepticism within a risk-based auditing framework in regional Public Accounting Firms in Indonesia.

Methodology: This qualitative exploratory study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with four auditors from regional Public Accounting Firms in Makassar, Indonesia, each with a minimum of three years of audit experience. Document analyses of International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 200, ISA 315, and ISA 540 complemented the interviews. Thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring patterns in risk assessment, professional judgements, and responses to climate-related uncertainty.

Results: The findings reveal three dominant themes: (1) climate-related risk is primarily incorporated into the entity-level risk assessment stage; (2) its classification as a material misstatement risk remains inconsistent; and (3) climate-related accounting estimates significantly increase reliance on management assumptions, thereby intensifying challenges to auditor independence and professional skepticism. The integration of climate risk remains largely principle-based and dependent on judgment rather than on structured technical guidance.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that climate-related risk reshapes inherent risk assessment and expands the behavioral dimensions of auditing practice in regional contexts. The findings highlight the need for more operational guidance to support the consistent integration of climate considerations within risk-based auditing.

Limitations: This study is limited to a small sample of regional auditors and relies on qualitative perceptions.

Contributions: This research contributes to auditing literature by empirically illustrating how climate-related risk affects professional judgment, independence, and skepticism in emerging regional audit environments.

Keywords: Audit Risk Auditor Independence Climate-Related Risk Professional Skepticism Risk-Based Auditing
How to Cite
“
Susanto, E., Tenriwaru, T., & Kalsum, U. (2026). Auditing Climate-Related Risk: Challenges to Auditor Independence and Professional Skepticism. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 7(3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i3.6350
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. AccountancyEurope. (2021). Climate risk: Implications for auditors. Retrieved from https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/publications/climate-risk-implications-for-auditors/
  2. Alshahrani, F., Eulaiwi, B., Duong, L., & Taylor, G. (2025). Climate change disclosure performance and audit fees: evidence from Australia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(5), 1208-1242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2023-0509
  3. Andersson, F. N., & Arvidsson, S. (2023). Understanding, mapping and reporting of climate-related risks among listed firms in Sweden. Climate Policy, 23(8), 945-958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2116383
  4. Bingler, J. A., & Colesanti Senni, C. (2022). Taming the Green Swan: A criteria-based analysis to improve the understanding of climate-related financial risk assessment tools. Climate Policy, 22(3), 356-370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2032569
  5. Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 517-549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
  6. Borghei, Z., Linnenluecke, M., & Bui, B. (2024). The disclosure of climate-related risks and opportunities in financial statements: the UK’s FTSE 100. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(3), 1031-1063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2023-1998
  7. Coman, D. M., Ionescu, C. A., Duic?, A., Coman, M. D., Uzlau, M. C., Stanescu, S. G., & State, V. (2022). Digitization of accounting: the premise of the paradigm shift of role of the professional accountant. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3359. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073359
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches: Sage.
  9. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
  10. Ding, X., Chourou, L., & Ben-Amar, W. (2024). Carbon emissions and audit fees: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 60, 101139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101139
  11. Dombrovska, N. (2023). Digital transformation of accounting: the impact of technologies on the efficiency and quality of financial reporting. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 33(2), 239-246. doi:https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2023.02.239
  12. Farooq, M., & Muhammad, H. (2025). Climate governance and sustainability reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(4), 5430-5445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3259
  13. Gao, L., & Calderon, T. G. (2023). Climate change risk disclosures and audit fees: A text analytics assessment. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 20(2), 71-93. doi:https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2021-003
  14. Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265-1297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298
  15. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  16. Hartlieb, S., & Eierle, B. (2024). Do auditors respond to clients’ climate change-related external risks? Evidence from audit fees. European Accounting Review, 33(3), 1075-1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2141811
  17. Hestyaningsih, H., Martini, M., & Anggraeni, M. (2020). Auditor switching: Analisis berdasar pergantian manajemen, financial distress, rentabilitas, dan ukuran kantor akuntan publik. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Manajemen, 1(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v1i3.26
  18. Hrazdil, K., Li, J., & Zhang, R. (2025). Adverse climate-related incidents and audit pricing: International evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2025.100082
  19. Izzalqurny, T. R., & Utami, H. (2024). Penerapan pembelajaran audit berbasis risiko dengan menggunakan aplikasi Atlas (Kajian literatur). Paper presented at the Prosiding National Seminar on Accounting, Finance, and Economics (NSAFE).
  20. Kolisnyk, O., & Skliarov, D. (2025). Transformation of financial accounting: From traditional methods to digitalization. Business Navigator. doi:10.32782/business-navigator.79-36
  21. Kumar, R. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners.
  22. Kumarasiri, J., Morrison, L., & Maran, L. (2025). Climate?related risk reporting and the role of management accountants. Australian Accounting Review, 35(4), 324-341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.70013
  23. Mamatzakis, E. C., & Tzouvanas, P. (2025). Greenhouse gas emissions and quality of financial reporting: evidence from the EU. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(3), 649-678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2023-0212
  24. Nyakuwanika, M., & Panicker, M. (2025). The role of environmental accounting in mitigating climate change: ESG disclosures and effective reporting—A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(9), 480. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18090480
  25. Pandini, I., Nugroho, M., & Arifin, M. (2025). Analisis kualitas informasi akuntansi dan risiko implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) terhadap efektivitas pengelolaan keuangan di Direktorat Pembinaan Masyarakat Polda Jatim. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 6(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.32815/jubis.v6i1.2581
  26. Purba, R., Sitanggang, C. M. B., & Simalango, M. A. (2025). The important role of audit evidence in ensuring the fairness of financial statements. Reviu Akuntansi, Manajemen, dan Bisnis, 5(1), 107-116. doi:10.35912/rambis.v5i1.3683
  27. Rahayu, R., Aulia, R., Atriani, E., Nurhayati, N., Arni, A., & Arsal, M. (2024). Transformasi digital terhadap peran akuntan sebagai konsultan digital: Dampak sosial dan ekonomi terhadap pengembangan industri dan ekonomi digital. IJMA (Indonesian Journal of Management and Accounting), 5(2), 285-293. doi:https://doi.org/10.21927/ijma.2024.5(2).2895-293
  28. Siahaan, L., & Purba, S. (2024). Penerapan ISAK 35 tentang Laporan Keuangan Organisasi Non-Laba pada Gereja HKI Tigabolon. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan dan Akuntabilitas, 3(2), 51-61. doi:10.35912/jastaka.v3i2.2786
  29. Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
  30. Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., Marques, R. P., & Bastos, M. A. (2023). Challenges of education in the accounting profession in the Era 5.0: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2220198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2220198
  31. Yang, X., Wei, L., Deng, R., Cao, J., & Huang, C. (2023). Can climate-related risks increase audit fees?–Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104194
  32. Yasa, P., Yuliansyah, Y., & Kesumaningrum, N. (2021). The influence of ethics, experience, and competence on auditors’ professional skepticism (Study at BPKP representative of Lampung Province). Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan dan Akuntabilitas, 1, 1-23. doi:10.35912/jastaka.v1i1.34
  33. Zhang, Z., & Sun, B. (2025). Climate policy uncertainty and corporate disclosure strategies: Evidence from financial statement comparability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3905-3927. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3164
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.