Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Penumpang Bus Trans Donggala

https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v6i2.4644
Published: Jul 18, 2025

Abstract:

Purpose: This study analyzes the social and economic impacts of the Trans Donggala Bus as a mode of inter-city public transportation connecting Donggala Regency and Palu City. The objective is to evaluate its role in improving community mobility and economic welfare in regions with limited infrastructure.

Methodology/approach: The research adopts a qualitative descriptive approach using surveys, in-depth interviews with stakeholders, and direct observations at the bus terminal. Data were grouped thematically to explore both social and economic dimensions of the bus service's impact.

Results/findings: Findings reveal that the Trans Donggala Bus has had positive socio-economic effects. Socially, it enhances public access to education, health services, and markets in Palu City, reduces the rural-urban gap, and strengthens social interactions. Economically, it lowers transportation costs, allowing residents to reallocate funds for other household needs. Despite these benefits, challenges persist, including limited fleet numbers, insufficient route coverage, and inadequate terminal infrastructure, which hinder service efficiency.

Conclusion: The Trans Donggala Bus has improved accessibility and reduced costs for communities, but optimization of routes, fleet expansion, and facility upgrades are needed to maximize its impact.

Limitations: The study focuses solely on the Donggala–Palu route and uses qualitative methods limited to interviews and observations. Thus, it does not fully represent the views of the entire community across different areas.

Contribution: This study highlights the importance of public transportation in enhancing mobility and economic resilience in underdeveloped regions. It also provides insights for local governments in developing sustainable and inclusive transport policies.

Keywords:
1. Economic Impact
2. Social impact
3. Trans Donggala Bus
Authors:
1 . Nurul Amalya Ahmadi
2 . Eko Jokolelono
View PDF
How to Cite
Ahmadi, N. A., & Jokolelono, E. (2025). Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Penumpang Bus Trans Donggala. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 6(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v6i2.4644
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juli
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

    Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2013. Teori-Teori Pembangunan Ekonomi.

    Agustin, Imma Widyawati, and Septiana Hariyani. 2021. “TOD (Transit Oriented Development): Teori, Metode, Dan Implementasi Sebagai Solusi Mengatasi Keruwetan Transportasi.” 2.

    Anwar, Syamsul. 2019. “Analisis Bukti Empiris Tentang Dampak Ekuitas Sosial Ekonomi Operasional Bus Rapid Transit (Brt) Di Negara Berkembang.” Eduka?: Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum, Dan Bisnis 4(2). doi: 10.32493/eduka.v4i2.3851.

    Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. “Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020.” Badan Pusat Statistik.

    Hidayat, Muhammad Fathur, and Nur Rahmawati Syamsiyah. 2023. “Analisis Kelengkapan Fasilitas Terminal Bus Kartasura Berdasarkan Permenhub RI Nomor PM 24 Tahun 2021.” Prosiding (SIAR) Seminar Ilmiah Arsitektur 662–71.

    Mafliyanti, Febriska Fitria, and Muhammad Halley Yudhistira. 2022. “Pengaruh Biaya Perjalanan Terhadap Perubahan Pilihan Moda Transportasi: Studi Kasus Pekerja Komuter Jabodetabek.” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota 18(4):400–413. doi: 10.14710/pwk.v18i4.44136.

    Mulyani, Endang. 2017. Ekonomi Pembagunan. Vol. 6.

    Muthiah, Ade Naila et al. 2024. “Estimasi Rata-Rata Dan Total Biaya Transportasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Matematika Unimed Menggunakan Metode Cluster Sampling.” 4.

    Nur, Nur Khaerat et al. 2021. Sistem Transportasi. Vol. 1.

    Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan. 2021. “PERATURAN MENTERI PERHUBUNGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR PM 24 TAHUN 2021 TENT ANG PENYELENGGARAAN TERMINAL PENUMPANG ANGKUTAN JALAN.”

    Pojani, Dorina, and Dominic Stead. 2014. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Explaining Dutch Transit-Oriented Development Challenges.” Environment and Planning A 46(10):2401–18. doi: 10.1068/a130169p.

    Romadhani, No et al. 2019. Konsep Perencanaan Transportasi. Vol. 11.

    Satria, Punjung Azis et al. 2019. “Evaluasi Kesesuaian Rute Angkutan Umum Kota Malang Berdasarkan Struktur Ruang Kota Malang.” Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE) 8(3):21–30.

    Sudaryono, and Nana Sukmadinata Syaodih. 2010. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.” P. 326 in Pustaka Setia.

    Tamin, Ofyar Z. 1999. Perencanaan Dan Pemodelan Transportasi.

    Utami, Adita, and William Kurnia Rubin Natio. 2021. “Analisis Perbandingan Waktu Perjalanan Dan Biaya Antara Kendaraan Pribadi Dan Transjakarta Menggunakan Metode PCI (Studi Kasus?: TJ Koridor IX Pinang Ranti-Pluit).” Reka Buana?: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Dan Teknik Kimia 6(2):150–59. doi: 10.33366/rekabuana.v6i2.2649.

    Zaenal, Ali. 2023. “Derum Sejarah Bus, Kendaraan Untuk Semua.” Retrieved January 12, 2025 (https://tirto.id/derum-sejarah-bus-kendaraan-untuk-semua-gTCA?utm_source=chatgpt.com).

  1. Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2013. Teori-Teori Pembangunan Ekonomi.
  2. Agustin, Imma Widyawati, and Septiana Hariyani. 2021. “TOD (Transit Oriented Development): Teori, Metode, Dan Implementasi Sebagai Solusi Mengatasi Keruwetan Transportasi.” 2.
  3. Anwar, Syamsul. 2019. “Analisis Bukti Empiris Tentang Dampak Ekuitas Sosial Ekonomi Operasional Bus Rapid Transit (Brt) Di Negara Berkembang.” Eduka?: Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum, Dan Bisnis 4(2). doi: 10.32493/eduka.v4i2.3851.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. “Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020.” Badan Pusat Statistik.
  5. Hidayat, Muhammad Fathur, and Nur Rahmawati Syamsiyah. 2023. “Analisis Kelengkapan Fasilitas Terminal Bus Kartasura Berdasarkan Permenhub RI Nomor PM 24 Tahun 2021.” Prosiding (SIAR) Seminar Ilmiah Arsitektur 662–71.
  6. Mafliyanti, Febriska Fitria, and Muhammad Halley Yudhistira. 2022. “Pengaruh Biaya Perjalanan Terhadap Perubahan Pilihan Moda Transportasi: Studi Kasus Pekerja Komuter Jabodetabek.” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota 18(4):400–413. doi: 10.14710/pwk.v18i4.44136.
  7. Mulyani, Endang. 2017. Ekonomi Pembagunan. Vol. 6.
  8. Muthiah, Ade Naila et al. 2024. “Estimasi Rata-Rata Dan Total Biaya Transportasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Matematika Unimed Menggunakan Metode Cluster Sampling.” 4.
  9. Nur, Nur Khaerat et al. 2021. Sistem Transportasi. Vol. 1.
  10. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan. 2021. “PERATURAN MENTERI PERHUBUNGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR PM 24 TAHUN 2021 TENT ANG PENYELENGGARAAN TERMINAL PENUMPANG ANGKUTAN JALAN.”
  11. Pojani, Dorina, and Dominic Stead. 2014. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Explaining Dutch Transit-Oriented Development Challenges.” Environment and Planning A 46(10):2401–18. doi: 10.1068/a130169p.
  12. Romadhani, No et al. 2019. Konsep Perencanaan Transportasi. Vol. 11.
  13. Satria, Punjung Azis et al. 2019. “Evaluasi Kesesuaian Rute Angkutan Umum Kota Malang Berdasarkan Struktur Ruang Kota Malang.” Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE) 8(3):21–30.
  14. Sudaryono, and Nana Sukmadinata Syaodih. 2010. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.” P. 326 in Pustaka Setia.
  15. Tamin, Ofyar Z. 1999. Perencanaan Dan Pemodelan Transportasi.
  16. Utami, Adita, and William Kurnia Rubin Natio. 2021. “Analisis Perbandingan Waktu Perjalanan Dan Biaya Antara Kendaraan Pribadi Dan Transjakarta Menggunakan Metode PCI (Studi Kasus?: TJ Koridor IX Pinang Ranti-Pluit).” Reka Buana?: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Dan Teknik Kimia 6(2):150–59. doi: 10.33366/rekabuana.v6i2.2649.
  17. Zaenal, Ali. 2023. “Derum Sejarah Bus, Kendaraan Untuk Semua.” Retrieved January 12, 2025 (https://tirto.id/derum-sejarah-bus-kendaraan-untuk-semua-gTCA?utm_source=chatgpt.com).