Kajian Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental

Kajian Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (KPKM) is a national, peer-reviewed and scholarly journal, which accepts and publishes high-quality article discussing various interesting issues on psychology and mental health. Kajian Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (KPKM) welcomes researchers, practitioners and academicians to submit empirical research, theroretical articles, and reviews related to updated topics of psychology.

Kajian Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (KPKM) is a national, peer-reviewed and scholarly journal, which accepts and publishes high-quality article discussing various interesting issues on psychology and mental health. Kajian Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (KPKM) welcomes researchers, practitioners and academicians to submit empirical research, theroretical articles, and reviews related to updated topics of psychology.

Published
2025-09-17

Articles

Optimalisasi Dampak Kesehatan Mental dari Interdependensi Ekonomi di ASEAN

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of ASEAN’s deepening economic integration on workers’ mental health. This study focuses on transnational exposure through trade dependence and foreign direct investment (FDI)and its psychological consequences via job insecurity and cultural mismatch. Research methodology: Using cross-sectional survey data from 5,000 cross-border workers in six ASEAN countries, the research applies a multilayer network model combining (1) an economic exposure index (trade/GDP ratio and FDI inflows), (2) DSM-5-based anxiety and depression scales, and (3) moderated mediation testing for cultural buffers, particularly collectivism. Results: Findings show that Higher export-to-GDP ratios significantly predicted increased anxiety symptoms (? = 0.42, p < 0.001), fully mediated by precarious employment. Contrary to expectations, collectivism exacerbated stress among low-skilled workers (? = 0.21, p = 0.03). Network analysis further revealed bridging nodes linking economic sectors and mental health outcomes, thereby emphasizing systemic interdependence. Conclusions: ASEAN economic interdependence generates measurable psychological costs for labor, particularly through insecure employment arrangements in Malaysia. Rather than mitigating stress, cultural collectivism may intensify pressure in vulnerable conditions. Limitations: The cross-sectional design restricts causal inference, and self-reported measures may carry bias. Broader longitudinal and qualitative approaches are required to validate these findings. Contribution: This study provides the first empirical evidence of macroeconomic-mental health linkages in the ASEAN region. This highlights the necessity of policy interventions, including selective de-growth strategies, in sectors heavily reliant on external trade to protect worker well-being.

Peranan Teori Interdependensi pada peningkatan pengambilan keputusan pemikiran

Purpose: This study aims to bridge quantum psychology with dyadic interdependence theory by modeling relational states as entangled systems. The main focus is to examine whether decision-making in interdependent relationships exhibits patterns that go beyond classical logical predictions. Research Methodology: The research adopts a mixed-method approach. First, a quantum probability framework is applied to predict non-local correlations in partner judgments, including the simultaneity of trust and conflict. Second, a behavioral experiment was conducted with 150 couples, where they faced a series of conflict and collaboration scenarios. The analysis focused on violations of classical probability in interdependent choices. Results: The findings reveal the presence of quantum interference effects (|?|² = 0.78) when couples resolved conflicts. This indicates that cognitive interdependence does not fully conform to classical probability principles but instead demonstrates superpositional dynamics of attitudes that are characteristic of quantum models. Conclusions: Relational interdependence operates through quantum cognitive mechanisms that allow couples to simultaneously express trust and conflict. This challenges traditional rational frameworks and underscores the need for new perspectives in understanding dyadic relationships. Limitations: The study is limited to heterogeneous adult couples and employs an experimental design that still requires expansion into more diverse cultural contexts and relational types. Contribution: This research proposes a quantum interdependence model that redefines relational dynamics, with practical implications for couple therapy and organizational behavior, while also extending the application of quantum psychology to the social domain.