Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan dan Akuntabilitas

The Implemetation of Accountability in Realizing Good Governance in Bintan Regency

2025-09-22T14:44:24+07:00

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of writing this policy paper is to analyse the implementation of the principle of accountability by identifying the obstacles or issues faced in order to enhance accountability in the effort to achieve good governance in Bintan Regency.

Methodology/approach: The research method used in the preparation of this Policy Paper is qualitative research. The data is analysed descriptively in a qualitative manner. Qualitative data analysis is inductive, meaning it is analysis based on the data obtained.

Results/findings: This policy paper produces policy recommendations by formulating policies in the form of a Regent Regulation on the Implementation Guidelines for SAKIP, which includes procedures for setting performance indicator targets and strategic objectives of the Regional Device, and also explains the alignment between performance planning documents.

Conclusion: There are four issues that cause the performance accountability not to be suboptimal: 1) The quality of planning is not yet optimal; 2) Performance measurement has not been conducted comprehensively down to the lowest units; 3) Performance reports have not been prepared completely and do not present adequate data; 4) Evaluation of the implementation of SAKIP has not been carried out in a deep or comprehensive manner.

Limitations: The collection of primary data through interviews where, despite efforts to maintain objectivity, the interview results still contain elements of subjectivity from the informants that can influence data interpretation.

Contribution: This policy recommendation can be used as a basis for formulating policies related to increasing the accountability of the Bintan regency government.

Sentiment Analysis of Youtube Video Comments on Dirty Vote Movie

2025-12-12T13:47:58+07:00

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the sentiment of comments on YouTube videos discussing the movie Dirty Vote, which are divided into positive, negative, and neutral categories.

Research methodology: The method used is quantitative descriptive, namely content/text analysis of the number of comments and sentiment analysis of comments on the YouTube video content of Dirty Vote uploaded to the Dirty Vote YouTube channel.

Results: Results: Based on sentiment analysis of 32,209 comments on the Dirty Vote movie uploaded to YouTube between February 11 and 13, 2024, the sentiment distribution indicates a strong dominance of negative sentiment, with 18,978 comments (59%). This suggests that the movie triggered substantial criticism or strong emotional reactions from viewers. Positive sentiment reached 9,676 comments (30%), reflecting appreciations for the movie’s content, message, or relevance to political discourse. Meanwhile, 3,555 comments (11%) were categorized as neutral, generally consisting of descriptive statements, clarifications, or non-emotive responses.

Conclusions: The analysis of 32,209 YouTube comments on Dirty Vote shows dominant negative sentiment (59%), followed by positive (30%) and neutral (11%). This suggests the film strongly impacts audiences, generating both criticism and political awareness, and highlighting how political documentaries can spark debate and polarization.

Limitations: References related to sentiment analysis on social media in the perspective of political communication studies are still quite limited and lack depth.

Contribution: Enriching the body of research on political communication on social media, particularly YouTube, by using sentiment analysis methods through the BERT model.