Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM <p style="text-align: justify;">Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia (JIHHAM) adalah jurnal yang menerbitkan artikel dengan topik bahasan seputar dunia hukum serta masalah-masalah kemanusiaan. JIHHAM menyambut baik pengiriman artikel ilmiah berbentuk studi hukum empiris maupun studi hukum normatif. JIHHAM diharapkan dapat menjadi mediator bagi para dosen, mahasiswa, peneliti, serta praktisi untuk menyebarluaskan temuan, ide dan gagasannya dalam menyelesaikan berbagai permasalahan hukum yang terjadi serta untuk memajukan ilmu hukum di Indonesia.</p> en-US <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p> <ol> <li class="show">Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li> <li class="show">Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.</li> <li class="show">Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.</li> </ol> admin@penerbitgoodwood.com (admin Penerbit Goodwood) Thu, 08 Jan 2026 15:37:02 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.10 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Analysis of Standard Clauses in Online Loan Agreements in Indonesia https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/4362 <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study analyzes standard clauses in online loan agreements in Indonesia, which often cause injustice to consumers. The use of standardized clauses has become increasingly common in digital financial services, but these clauses are often one-sided, favoring the service providers over consumers. This issue can lead to significant legal and ethical concerns.</p> <p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>This study uses a normative juridical research method with a literature study approach, reviewing relevant regulations, including Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), along with other applicable consumer protection laws in Indonesia. By analyzing the current legal framework and court decisions, the research aims to uncover the practical implications of these clauses.</p> <p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>The results indicate that standard clauses such as exoneration clauses, opaque fines, and misuse of personal data often disadvantage consumers by limiting their rights and withholding key information.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of standard clauses in online loan agreements in Indonesia continues to create problems due to unequal rights and obligations between providers and consumers. Although regulations exist, weak enforcement and low consumer awareness limit effective protection.</p> <p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Although the GCPL (Government Consumer Protection Law) has regulated the prohibition of harmful clauses, implementation in the field is still weak due to a lack of supervision, low consumer literacy, and limited access to legal recourse.</p> <p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study highlights the need to strengthen regulations, improve consumer education, and enhance supervision of online loan providers to ensure fair, balanced, and transparent consumer protection.</p> Dewi Ratih Kumalasari Copyright (c) 2026 Dewi Ratih Kumalasari https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/4362 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Analysis of Criminalization of Perpetrators of Human Trafficking Crimes Based on the Trilogy of Legal Objectives https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5566 <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to analyze the modus operandi of human trafficking in Indonesia, its legal framework, and the application of criminal sanctions to perpetrators based on the legal objectives of justice, certainty, and utility.</p> <p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Using secondary sources and a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutes, regulations, and legal concepts through a descriptive-analytical method to assess the consistency of legislation and its application in human trafficking cases.</p> <p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Findings show that human trafficking in Indonesia involves sexual exploitation, forced labor, child trafficking, and organ trade, regulated under Law No. 21/2007, the Criminal Code, and Law No. 35/2014 on Child Protection.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Human trafficking in Indonesia includes sexual exploitation, forced labor, child trafficking, and organ trade. It is addressed through Law No. 21/2007 as a <em>lex specialis</em>, supported by the Criminal Code and Child Protection Law.</p> <p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study uses a normative juridical analysis at a macro level, without empirical field data or direct perspectives, so it does not fully capture local implementation issues or judicial inconsistencies.</p> <p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This research offers a theoretical and practical framework for harmonizing the trilogy of legal objectives in criminalizing human trafficking and sentencing policies in Indonesia.</p> Dioz Thimoteus Togatorop, Maya Shafira, Muhammad Farid, Heni Siswanto, Refi Meidiantama Copyright (c) 2026 Dioz Thimoteus Togatorop, Maya Shafira, Muhammad Farid, Heni Siswanto, Refi Meidiantama https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5566 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Philosophical Critique of Capital Market Regulation: A Case Study between Public Interest and Privacy https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/4728 <p><strong>Purpose</strong>: This study aims to analyze capital market regulation through the lens of philosophical principles to evaluate the balance between transparency for the public interest and the protection of individual privacy rights in achieving justice.</p> <p><strong>Methodology/Approach</strong>: This research adopts a normative legal method supported by conceptual and philosophical approaches. The study analyzes primary legal instruments, secondary literature, and tertiary references through qualitative library research to examine regulatory tensions between transparency and privacy in Indonesia’s capital market governance.</p> <p><strong>Results/Findings</strong>: The findings show that Rawlsian justice, Kantian autonomy, and utilitarian ethics are useful frameworks for evaluating the ethics of capital market regulation. Although Indonesia’s Capital Market Law and OJK regulations emphasize transparency, investor data privacy remains inadequately protected. Adopting stronger data protection standards, such as the GDPR, alongside local principles of <em>maslahah</em> and subsidiarity, can enhance regulatory fairness and reduce burdens on small market participants.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The study concludes that harmonizing transparency and privacy requires risk-based, ethically informed reforms that are responsive to technological changes. Strengthening the integration between capital market law and personal data protection is essential for creating a more just and sustainable regulatory framework.</p> <p><strong>Limitations</strong>: This research is limited to theoretical-normative analysis and focuses primarily on the Indonesian legal context, which may affect its broader applicability.</p> <p><strong>Contribution</strong>: The study contributes to the intersection of legal philosophy, capital market regulation, and data governance by proposing a value-based framework for balancing transparency and privacy. Its implications are particularly relevant for lawmakers, regulators, and legal scholars in emerging economies.</p> Enos Martryn Budiman Copyright (c) 2026 Enos Martryn Budiman https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/4728 Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pertambangan Ilegal di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Provinsi Lampung https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5601 <p><strong><em>Purpose: </em></strong><em>This study examines the efforts to combat illegal mining activities in the jurisdiction of Tulang Bawang Regency, Lampung Province, by analyzing both penal and non-penal approaches as well as the effectiveness of law enforcement through the lens of legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Methodology: </em></strong><em>Using a normative juridical approach, this research relies on primary and secondary legal materials. Primary data were obtained from interviews with key informants and relevant case observations, while secondary data were collected from legislation, books on penal policy, scientific journals, and previous studies related to criminal law enforcement in the mining sector.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Results: </em></strong><em>The findings reveal that the penal approach, as regulated in Law No. 3 of 2020 on Mineral and Coal Mining and the Law on Environmental Protection and Management, provides a strong legal basis to impose criminal sanctions on illegal mining actors. However, law enforcement remains constrained by overlapping regulations, complex licensing procedures, limited resources of law enforcement agencies, and low public legal awareness. Non-penal measures such as community education, simplification of mining permits, economic empowerment programs, and local participation are crucial to addressing the socio-economic roots of illegal mining. </em></p> <p><strong><em>Limitations: </em></strong><em>This study is confined to examining legal developments by comparing the Corruption Eradication Law with the provisions in the New Criminal Code.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Contribution: </em></strong><em>This study contributes to the discourse on criminal law policy by highlighting the need for a balanced combination of penal and non-penal strategies to protect natural resources and achieve sustainable development. The findings can serve as a reference for local governments, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers in formulating more effective measures to eradicate illegal mining in Tulang Bawang and similar regions in Indonesia.</em></p> Refi Meidiantama, Fristia Berdian Tamza, Mamanda Syahputra Ginting Copyright (c) 2026 Refi Meidiantama, Fristia Berdian Tamza, Mamanda Syahputra Ginting https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5601 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Efforts to Address Sexual Violence Against Girls with Disabilities https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5187 <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to examine the effectiveness of legal responses to sexual violence against girls with disabilities in Indonesia, identifying gaps in protection and enforcement.</p> <p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Employing a normative-empirical legal analysis, the research reviews positive law provisions namely the Child Protection Act (UU No. 35/2014 as amended), the Disability Act (UU No. 8/2016), and the Sexual Violence Criminal Act (UU No. 12/2022) and analyzes Supreme Court and lower court decisions. Empirical data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with law enforcement officers and observations of case handling in selected provincial offices.</p> <p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Despite a comprehensive statutory framework, implementation is hampered by limited officer training, inadequate facilities, and low public awareness. Criminal legal protection for girls with disabilities remains neither fully effective nor sufficiently inclusive, with procedural delays and accessibility barriers persisting.</p> <p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study is constrained by its qualitative focus on selected jurisdictions and does not include quantitative victim-survey data, which may limit generalizability across all regions of Indonesia.</p> <p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Engagement this research informs policymakers, legal practitioners, and disability rights advocates on improving justice outcomes for one of Indonesia’s most vulnerable groups.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Legal protection for girls with disabilities who are victims of sexual violence is regulated by several laws in Indonesia, but its implementation remains ineffective due to limited understanding among law enforcement, inadequate facilities, and low public awareness. The main obstacles include unintegrated regulations, insensitive law enforcement officers, and limited legal services.</p> Ririn Wijayanti, Maya Shafira, Muhammad Farid, Diah Agustiniati, Refi Mediantama Copyright (c) 2026 Ririn Wijayanti, Maya Shafira, Muhammad Farid, Diah Agustiniati, Refi Mediantama https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/JIHHAM/article/view/5187 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0700