JIHHAM

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli

Articles

Criminal Liability of Police Officers for Assault Resulting in Death: The Bripda Mesias Case in Tual City

A Abdul Munim N Noenik Soekorini R Renda Aranggraeni
06 July 2026 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6809
Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the criminal liability of police officers for assault resulting in death through the 2026 case of Police Brigadier Mesias in Tual City. It examines applicable criminal law provisions, law enforcement mechanisms, and judicial processes, while proposing reforms to strengthen police accountability in Indonesia.
Research Methodology: The study employed a normative-empirical legal approach using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative analyses. Data were collected through interviews, observations, document reviews, and literature studies, then analyzed using juridical, content, and thematic techniques with triangulation to ensure validity.
Results: The findings show that all elements of Article 351(3) of the Indonesian Criminal Code were fulfilled. Police officers do not enjoy criminal immunity, and the defense of acting in an official capacity was rejected because the use of force violated the principles of necessity and proportionality. The court imposed a five-year prison sentence, considering both aggravating and mitigating factors.
Conclusions: Accountability is hindered by limited independence in internal investigations, corps solidarity, sentencing disparities, and weak witness protection. Public and civil society pressure played a significant role in ensuring accountability. Institutional reforms are needed to strengthen transparency and independent oversight.
Limitations: The study focuses on a single case, limiting broader generalization. Access to internal police documents was restricted.
Contributions: The study advances scholarship on police accountability, provides a framework for dual accountability, and offers practical insights for legal reform and policymaking.

Keywords: Criminal Liability Death Assault Institutional Accountability Police Officers Police Reform
How to Cite
“
Munim, A., Soekorini, N. ., & Aranggraeni, R. . (2026). Criminal Liability of Police Officers for Assault Resulting in Death: The Bripda Mesias Case in Tual City. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 6(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6809
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Ba, B. A., Knox, D., Mummolo, J., & Rivera, R. (2021). The role of officer race and gender in police– civilian interactions in Chicago. Science, 371(6530), 696-702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd 8694
  2. Baker, J., & Nasrudin, R. (2023). Is Indonesian police violence excessive? The dynamics of police shootings, 2005–2014. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 54(2), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/004 72336.2022.2138773
  3. Bayley, D. H., & Perito, R. (2010). The police in war: Fighting insurgency, terrorism, and violent crime. Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371972
  4. Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. National Institute of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1037/e575002012-001
  5. Boateng, F. D., Pryce, D. K., Dzordzormenyoh, M. K., Hsieh, M.-L., & Cuff, A. (2024). Empirical examination of factors that influence official decisions in criminal cases against police officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(3), 462-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09756-w
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  7. Brunson, R. K. (2007). “Police don’t like black people”: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 71-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-913 3.2007.00423.x
  8. Crank, J. P. (2004). Understanding police culture (2nd ed.).
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.).
  10. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.
  11. Engel, R. S., Corsaro, N., Isaza, G. T., & McManus, H. D. (2022). Assessing the impact of de-escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(2), 199-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-91 33.12574
  12. Farrow, K. (2024). Blame culture: The line between blame and accountability in policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18, paae034. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae034
  13. Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11292-014-9210-y
  14. Goldsmith, A. J. (2010). Policing’s new visibility. British Journal of Criminology, 50(5), 914-934. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq033
  15. Hoekstra, M., & Sloan, C. (2022). Does race matter for police use of force? Evidence from 911 calls. American Economic Review, 112(3), 827-860. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201292
  16. Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 203-210. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/police/paq027
  17. Human Rights Watch. (2022). World report 2022: Events of 2021. Human Rights Watch. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxcrx9q
  18. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
  19. Kochel, T. R., & Skogan, W. G. (2021). Accountability and transparency as levers to promote public trust and police legitimacy: Findings from a natural experiment. Policing: An International Journal, 44(6), 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-04-2021-0062
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.).
  21. Kutnjak Ivkovi?, S., Maskály, J., Kule, A., & Haberfeld, M. M. (2022). Police Code of Silence in Times of Change.
  22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
  23. Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K. L., & Mechkova, V. (2020). Constraining governments: New indices of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal accountability. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 811-820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000222
  24. McLean, K., Stoughton, S. W., & Alpert, G. P. (2022). Police uses of force in the USA: A wealth of theories and a lack of evidence. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, 6(3–4), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-022-00078-7
  25. Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77.
  26. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
  27. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  28. Oramas Mora, D., Terrill, W., & Foster, J. (2023). A decade of police use of deadly force research (2011–2020). Police Quarterly, 26(4), 480-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221123591
  29. Qureshi, D. (2022). Witness protection: An imperative for criminal justice. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 4(2), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069211069698
  30. Setiawan, K. M. P., & Tomsa, D. (2023). Defending a vulnerable yet resilient democracy: Civil society activism in Jokowi’s Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(3), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231209058
  31. Sklansky, D. A. (2008). Democracy and the police. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503624474
  32. Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
  33. Terrill, W., Paoline, E. A., III, & Manning, P. K. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003-1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01012.x
  34. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609
  35. Walker, S. (2012). Institutionalizing police accountability reforms: The problem of making police reforms endure. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 32(1), 57-92. https://doi.org/10.2139/s srn.2139534
  36. Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Hinkle, J. C., & Eck, J. E. (2010). Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder? Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.11 11/j.1745-9133.2010.00617.x
  37. Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2006). Race and policing in America: Conflict and reform.
  38. Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2017). Mirage of police reform: Procedural justice and police legitimacy. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520965256
  39. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.).
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.