JIHHAM

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli

Articles

Law Enforcement Regarding Corruption Offenses in Bridge Construction Projects: (Review of Judgment No. 44/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2025/PN.Tjk)

A Andriansyah Andriansyah S Sudarmono Sudarmono P Perdana Kusuma P Perdana Putra Saradi
03 July 2026 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6619
Abstract

Purpose: This study examines law enforcement against corruption in bridge construction projects, as reflected in Decision No. 44/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2025/PN.Tjk. This study focuses on analyzing judges’ legal considerations and evaluating the effectiveness of law enforcement in creating deterrent effects and restoring state financial losses caused by corrupt practices in infrastructure development projects.

Research Methodology: This study uses a qualitative interpretative approach with a normative juridical method supported by court decision analysis. Data were obtained from legal documents, regulations, and judicial considerations. The analysis applies IFE and EFE matrices, followed by SWOT and QSPM to determine priority strategies.

Results: The findings show that anti-corruption law enforcement in bridge construction cases generally ensures legal certainty and procedural justice. However, challenges remain in recovering state losses and preventing systemic corruption. QSPM results indicate that strengthening inter-agency coordination and optimizing compensation penalties are key priority strategies.

Conclusions: Effective anti-corruption law enforcement requires stronger institutional coordination, consistent judicial approaches, and optimal implementation of compensation sanctions to strengthen deterrence and accountability in infrastructure projects.

Limitations: This study is limited to a single court decision and focuses primarily on normative juridical analysis.

Contributions: This study provides strategic recommendations for improving anti-corruption law enforcement and strengthening state financial recovery mechanisms in infrastructure corruption cases in Indonesia.

Keywords: Bridge Construction Project Corruption Court Decision Law Enforcement SWOT Analysis
How to Cite
“
Andriansyah , A. ., Sudarmono , S. ., Kusuma, P. ., & Saradi, P. P. . (2026). Law Enforcement Regarding Corruption Offenses in Bridge Construction Projects: (Review of Judgment No. 44/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2025/PN.Tjk). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6619
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Alfiyan, A., & Rinova, D. (2024). Policy on Environmental Law Reform in the Context of Environmental Preservation in Bandar Lampung City. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(1), 27-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i1.3208
  2. Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Korupsi, good governance, dan komisi anti korupsi di Indonesia: Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
  3. Atmasasmita, R. (2014). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer: Prenadamedia Group.
  4. Barda Nawawi Arief, S. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan: Prenada Media.
  5. Budiati, L. (2020). Building the Integrity of Urban Development Planner Through Corruption Risk Management and Assessment: Literature Review. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 1(1), 83-104. doi:https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v1i1.41
  6. Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum, 41(5), 545-547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1188/14.onf.545-547
  7. David, M., David, F., & David, F. (2016). The quantitative strategic planning matrix: a new marketing tool. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25, 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148763
  8. De Batz, L., & Ko?enda, E. (2024). Financial crime and punishment: A meta?analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(4), 1338-1398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12580
  9. Fathni, I., Priyana, Y., & Primadhany, E. F. (2023). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Corruption, Law Enforcement, Economic Growth, and Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(02), 20-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i02.61
  10. Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective: Russell Sage Foundation.
  11. Hansen, S. (2025). White-collar crime in construction: Analysis of criminal liability for corruption involving corporations. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(2), 05024006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1222
  12. Hansen, S., Kartono, & Susanto. (2025). Fictitious projects: legal case analysis of construction fraud in a developing country. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(3), 05025005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1274
  13. Mahaputra, A., Mustofa, M., Shauki, E., & Koto, Z. (2026). Predictive Policing and Corporate Governance-Reframing Business Judgment Rule as a Preventive Framework for Corruption in Indonesian State-Owned Enterprises. Available at SSRN 6600678. doi:https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.09.02.634
  14. Manalu, M. V., & Seregig, I. K. (2026). Judicial Analysis of Collective and Continuing Theft Based on Indonesian Criminal Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(2), 61-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v5i2.6212
  15. Muladi, H. T. (2002). Prinsip Pengaturan dalam Kriminalisasi dalam Buku Demokratisasi. Hak Asasi Manusia dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, The Habibie Center, Jakarta.
  16. Nawawi Arief, B. (2010). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana: Perkembangan penyusunan konsep KUHP baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  17. Nkoba, N., & Amoah, C. (2025). Curbing corruption and unethical practices in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2567751
  18. Noviya, A., Samsidar, S., & Romdoni, M. (2025). Corruption in Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies and Juridical Analysis. Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian, 2, 20-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.62872/gzfyp749
  19. Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P. C., & Wang, T. (2021). Tackling corruption in urban infrastructure procurement: Dynamic evaluation of the critical constructs and the anti-corruption measures. Cities, 119, 103379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103379
  20. Paranata, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of anti-corruption policy: A future research agenda in Indonesia. Public Organization Review, 25(3), 1181-1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00847-8
  21. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia: Genta Pub.
  22. Sadiyah, F. (2025). Criticism and Hadis Explanation on Ability to Fight Invaders in MUI Fatwa No 83 of 2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(1), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v5i1.3696
  23. Satjipto, R. (2006). Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban. UKI Pers, Jakarta.
  24. Shukla, G. (2023). Doctrinal Legal Research: A Library-Based Research (pp. 226-239).
  25. Suardi, I., Rossieta, H., Diyanty, V., & Djakman, C. (2025). The acceptance of procurement system in affecting corruption in the Indonesian Government: user perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 14(4), 561-583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-05-2024-0077
  26. Suardi, I., Rossieta, H., Djakman, C., & Diyanty, V. (2024). Procurement governance in reducing corruption in the indonesian public sector: a mixed method approach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2393744. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2393744
  27. Suramin, S. (2021). Indonesian anti-corruption law enforcement: current problems and challenges. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 225-242. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46612
  28. UU No. 20, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (2001).
  29. UU No. 31, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (1999).
  30. Wibisana, A. W. (2025). Optimizing The Implementation Of Compliance Audit Functions In State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis Through The Lens Of Indonesian Corruption Law. Beijing L. Rev., 16, 1559. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.163078
  31. Yogi Prabowo, H., & Cooper, K. (2016). Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses. Journal of Financial Crime, 23, 1028-1062. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2015-0039
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.