JIHHAM

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli

Articles

Customary Law Challenges in the Ru-Ketu Tradition within Indonesia’s Rule of Law Framework

C Chatryen Dju Bire M Melinda Ratu Radja Y Yossie Maria Yulianty Jacob R Raditya Maharani J Jenny Ermalinda M Mardiana Hasbullah
03 July 2026 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6373
Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the role of the Ru-Ketu tradition within the framework of Indonesian law, focusing on the gap between its function as a living law and its declaratory status within the national legal system.

Research Methodology: The research adopts an empirical legal method with a socio-legal approach in Sabu Raijua Regency, and the data were analyzed qualitatively through categorization and thematic interpretation of primary and secondary data.

Results: The findings indicate that Ru-Ketu possesses a clear normative structure as an effective mechanism of social regulation in the Sabu society. However, its recognition at the national level remains largely declarative and is hindered by the dominance of positivist legal epistemology, internal religious dynamics, and folklorization risk.

Conclusions: This study concludes that a more inclusive and dialogic legal approach is needed to bridge the gap between customary and state law. Such an approach should go beyond symbolic recognition toward substantive integration, enabling customary law like Ru-Ketu to function as living law within Indonesia’s plural legal system while maintaining its social legitimacy and normative role.

Limitations: This study is limited to Sabu Raijua Regency; therefore, the findings are context-specific and reflect local socio-cultural conditions, and may not be fully generalizable to other customary law settings in Indonesia.

Contributions: This study contributes to the discourse on legal pluralism by highlighting the discrepancy between formal recognition and substantive function and promoting a more substantive integration of living law into Indonesia’s national legal system.

Keywords: Customary Law Legal Pluralism Living Law Ru-Ketu
How to Cite
“
Dju Bire, C. M., Radja, M. R. ., Jacob, Y. M. Y. ., Maharani, R. ., Ermalinda, J. ., & Hasbullah, M. . (2026). Customary Law Challenges in the Ru-Ketu Tradition within Indonesia’s Rule of Law Framework. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 6(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6373
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Aprilianti, A., & Kasmawati, K. (2022). Hukum Adat di Indonesia.
  2. Bedner, A., & Arizona, Y. (2019). Adat in Indonesian land law: a promise for the future or a dead end? The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 416-434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246
  3. Benda-Beckmann, K. v., & Turner, B. (2018). Legal pluralism, social theory, and the state. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 255-274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674
  4. Christinawati, A. D. (2024). Hukum Hidup dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Adat dan Dampaknya terhadap Penegakan Hukum. Civilia : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3(1), 84-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.572349/civilia.v3i1.1689
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130.
  6. Dawi, K., Alkadrie, S. M. R. R. M., Sitorus, A. P. M. C., & Septinawati, S. A. (2025). Pengakuan Hukum yang Hidup dan Asas Legalitas dalam KUHP Nasional: Kajian Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Belanda. Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(2), 2945-2951. doi:https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1567
  7. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods: Routledge.
  8. Disantara, F. P. (2021). Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia Sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, 6(1), 1-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129
  9. Fabra-Zamora, J. L. (2022). The conceptual problems arising from legal pluralism. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 37(1), 155-175.
  10. Faisal, S., & Anwar, R. (2024). Legalitas Hukum Adat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 13(2).
  11. Fatmawati, I. (2023). The Existence of Customary Law as Living Law of the Indonesian Nation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Community Studies.
  12. Fitria, I. (2020). Recognizing adat law: Problems and challenges in modern law system in Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(4), 503-516. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/iccle.v2i4.36472
  13. Halperin, J.-L. (2011). Law in books and law in action: The problem of legal change. Me. L. Rev., 64, 45.
  14. Hamida, N. A. (2022). Adat law and legal pluralism in Indonesia: toward a new perspective? Indon. JLS, 3, 1.
  15. Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal Pluralism: Concept, Theoretical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review, 6(2), 146–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566
  16. Ibrahim, J. (2020). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 57(11).
  17. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi?structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
  18. Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Paper presented at the Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Qualitative Sozialforschung.
  19. Lukas, A. V. A., Lattu, I. Y., Tampake, T., & Ludji, I. (2024). Ritual Rukat’tu sebagai Ruang Liminalitas dalam Perjumpaan Agama Kristen dan Jingitiu di Sabu Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity (JIREH), 6(2), 169-180. doi:https://doi.org/10.37364/jireh.v6i2.239
  20. Mandala, S., & Herman, K. M. S. (2025). Pemberlakuan Living Law Dalam Undang Undang Darurat Nomor 1 Tahun 1951 dan KUHP Baru: Studi Komparatif. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(2), 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i2.3629
  21. Moru, O. O. (2022). Kekristenan dan Tradisi Ru-ketu “Tinjauan Tipologi Helmut Richard Niebuhr Terhadap Pandangan Pro-Kontra Praktek Tradisi Ru-ketu Di kalangan Komunitas Kristen Sabu Barat Kabupaten Sabu Raijua”. Apostolos: Journal of Theology and Christian Education, 2(2), 68-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.52960/a.v2i2.141
  22. Narwadan, T. N., Lubis, A. F., & Abd Hakim, H. (2025). Teori Hukum Positif: Teori Komprehensif dan Perkembangannya: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
  23. Negara, A. S., & Lindayani, L. R. (2025). The Consistency of Customary Law in The Contemporary Era: A Study on the Tension Between Local Norms and State Legal Systems. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies (IJOMSS), 3(3), 280-283. doi:https://ojs.staira.ac.id/index.php/IJOMSS/index
  24. Pa, P. N. B. (2023). Tradisi Ru-Ketu: Studi Budaya dan Refleksi Teologis. Kupang: Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana.
  25. Ramadhan, M., & Boemiya, H. (2024). Customary Criminal Sanctions as Pathways to Environmental Justice in Indigenous Communities. Literate: International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(2), 230-249.
  26. Ramadhani, M. (2024). Tantangan implementasi pengakuan hukum adat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana baru di Indonesia. Syntax Idea, 6(8), 2708-3716. doi:https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i8.4356
  27. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907.
  28. Schmit, L. (2008). Decentralisation and legal reform in Indonesia: The pendulum effect. Indonesia law and society, 146-190.
  29. Shartika, R., Barus, N. F., & Rosmalinda, R. (2024). Progres Pengakuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Journal Sains Student Research, 2(5), 259-271. doi:https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v2i5.2653
  30. Soekanto, S. (2019). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
  31. Storey, J. (2009). Inventing popular culture: From folklore to globalization: John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Suartina, T. (2020). Between Control and Empowerment: Local Government and Acknowledgement of Adat Villages in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 10 (3), 340-359.
  33. Sumaya, P. S. (2025). Posisi Hukum Adat dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia: Antara Tradisi dan Modernisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Sosial, 6(2), 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.52188/jeas.v6i2.1406
  34. Tamam, B., & Putra, Y. B. T. (2025). Rekognisi Hukum Pidana Adat di Era Modernisasi Hukum Nasional. Policy and Law Journal, 2(2), 88-103.
  35. Van der Muur, W. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship studies, 22(2), 160-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495
  36. Zuliyah, S., Shalihah, F., Suryadi, S., Megawati, M., Putri, U. T., & Nugroho, R. M. (2023). The Philosophical Thought of the Prophetic Law in the Indonesian Legal System. Wisdom(2 (26)), 242-254.
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.