Analisis Eksternalitas Positif “Wisata Alam 21”

https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v1i1.1415
Published: Oct 13, 2022

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to analyze differences in economic and social conditions of the community before and after the existence of Nature Tourism 21 in Aji Mesir Village, Gedung Aji District, Tulang Bawang Regency. The aspects in this study are aspects of economic conditions and social conditions.

Research methodology: The research method used in this study uses a descriptive-comparative method with a qualitative approach. The data analysis method in this study used a different test analysis with the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.

Results: The results showed that there were significant differences between economic conditions, and social conditions, before and after the existence of Nature Tourism 21 which was felt by the community of Aji Mesir Village, Gedung Aji District, Tulang Bawang Regency.

Limitations: The limitation of this study is only to analyze the positive externalities and not to analyze the negative externalities of “Wisata Alam 21”.

Contribution: The results obtained from this study are expected to be one of the references in making policies based on the data presented to adjust the right policies, especially to increase the positive externalities of “Wisata Alam 21”.

Keywords:
1. Economic Impact
2. Social Impact
3. Nature Tourism 21
Authors:
1 . Heru Wahyudi
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
2 . Eko Ardianto
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
View PDF
How to Cite
Wahyudi, H., & Ardianto, E. (2022). Analisis Eksternalitas Positif “Wisata Alam 21”. Jurnal Studi Perhotelan Dan Pariwisata, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35912/jspp.v1i1.1415
Download Citation
  1. Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  2. BibTeX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Issue & Section
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): September
Articles
References
  1. Ambariani, B., & Nasir, M. (2018). Eksternalitas Infrastruktur Hijau (Studi Kasus: Taman Sari Di Kota Banda Aceh. Studi Kasus: Taman Sari Di Kota Banda Aceh.
  2. Astuti, Y. D. (2010). Pemetaan Dampak Ekonomi Pariwisata Dalam Penerapan Konsep Community Based Tourism (CBT) (Studi Kasus Desa Wisata Kebon Agung di Kabupaten Bantul). Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
  3. Chao, C.-C., Hazari, B. R., & Sgro, P. M. (2004). Tourism, globalization, social externalities, and domestic welfare. Research in International Business and Finance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2003.12.001
  4. HSB, I. S. (2019). Ekowisata Berbasis Masyarakat dikawasan Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser (Skripsi). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat.
  5. Irianto. (2011). Dampak Pariwisata Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Dan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Gili Trawangan Kecamatan Pemenang Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan.
  6. Mangkoesubroto, G. (1993). Ekonomi Publik (Ketiga). BPFE.
  7. Nurdin, S. S., & Silvia, V. (2019). Eksternalitas Positif Objek Wisata (Studi Kasus Pantai Lampuuk Kabupaten Aceh Besar). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM).
  8. Prasetyia, F. (2012). Bagian V?: Teori Eksternalitas. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya, 33.
  9. Rostiyati, A. (2013). Potensi Wisata di Lampung dan Pengembangannya.Patanjala. Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v5i1.185
  10. Sandi, I., & Dawood, T. C. (2019). Eksternalitas Pabrik Kelapa Sawit Di Aceh Tamiang.
  11. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
  12. Suwena, I. K., & W, I. G. N. (2017). Pengetahuan Dasar Ilmu Pariwisata. Pustaka laras. Pustaka laras.
  13. Ummudiyah, N. (2016). Analisis Dampak Ekonomi Desa Wisata Wukirsari Kecamatan Imogiri Kabupaten Bantul Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
  14. Utama, I. G. B. R. (2016). Pengantar Industri Pariwisata. CV Budi Utama.