Purpose: This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the influence of financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audits, change in auditors, change of director and frequent number of CEO's picture in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Research methodology: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Results: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Limitations: This study used logistic regression analysis using a combined model of Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score that still contained an inaccurate classification of fraud and non-fraud. In the research, the R-Square value was low which meant that the ability of independent variables to influence the dependent variable was still low. Contribution: This research is expected to enrich the literature and references that can be used as a reference in other studies as well as in the company. The results of this study are expected to provide a deeper understanding of how to predict fraudulent financial reporting using the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score. Keywords: Fraudulent financial reporting, Fraud pentagon, Beneish M-Score, Altman Z-Score

Purpose: This study aimed to understand the relationship between stakeholder and firm value with environmental performance as the intervening variable. The study was conducted on companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and listed in the PROPER program during 2016 and 2017. The stakeholder variables in this study consist of managerial ownership (manager), consumer, and employee. Research methodology: The samples were determined using purposive sampling with a total of 131 companies and using path analysis method as an expansion of regression analysis. Result: The result is managerial ownership, consumer, and employee do not affect firm value directly. Managerial ownership has a positive and significant effect on firm value through environmental performance. The consumer has a significant and negative effect on the firm value through environmental performance and employee has a significant and negative effect on the firm value. Limitation: The sample is limited for two years period and adjusted R2 is 21.5%. Contribution: This study can identify variables that affect firm value, especially: manager, consumer, employee and environmental performance. Keywords: Firm value, Stakeholder, Environmental performance

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the effect of audit rotation and audit fee policy toward audit quality with lowballing audit practice as the intervening variable. Research methodology: The research method used was path analysis with a sample of twenty manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2015-2019. Results: The research results prove that the audit rotation and audit fee policy significantly affect the audit quality through the lowballing audit. Limitations: The research sample used manufacturing companies listed on the IDX, so the generalization of this study's results for non-manufacturing and non-listed companies must be made carefully. Contribution: This research can provide benefits for Audit Firms, regulators (PPPK), and professional associations (IAPI) as an evaluation of the implementation of audit rotation policies, implementation of regulations for determining audit fees following IAPI's Regulation No. 2 of 2016 concerning Determination of Financial Report Audit Service Fees, as well as evaluation of the implementation of the audit quality indicator guidelines formulated by IAPI.  Keywords: Audit rotation, Policy of determining audit fee, Lowballing audit, Negative abnormal audit fee, Audit quality