Article Details
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Januari
Civil Liability of Wedding Organizers toward Vendors and Customers for Acts of the Organizing Committee
Purpose: This study aims to examine the forms and scope of the civil liability of wedding organizers toward third-party vendors and customers resulting from the actions of the organizing committee, and to develop a civil liability framework that provides legal certainty while ensuring balanced legal protection for all parties involved.
Research Methodology: This study adopts a qualitative approach using a normative juridical research method. The analysis is based on an extensive literature review of statutory regulations and national and international scholarly publications published within the last five years, supplemented by illustrative scenarios drawn from publicly reported patterns of wedding organizer disputes, used solely to contextualize the legal analysis rather than as a formal empirical dataset.
Results: The findings indicate that the civil liability of wedding organizers is primarily based on breach of contract, tort, and the principle of vicarious liability. Negligent acts committed by the organizing committee remain the responsibility of the wedding organizer insofar as they occur within the scope of their assigned duties. Financial transparency and effective internal governance constitute the primary preventive measures for minimizing the risk of legal disputes.
Conclusions: Wedding organizers bear the primary contractual responsibility toward both customers and vendors. An ideal liability model should incorporate comprehensive contractual provisions, effective supervision, and an accountable financial management system.
Limitations: This study is limited by its reliance on a normative legal approach and secondary data sources, without incorporating primary data obtained through direct interviews with the parties involved.
Contributions: This study contributes theoretically to the development of the doctrine of vicarious liability in project-based service industries and provides practical contributions to the establishment of contractual standards for the wedding organizer industry.
- Abidin, M., & Kahpi, A. (2021). Penerapan batas-batas wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam suatu perikatan. Jurnal Alauddin Law Development (ALDEV), 3(2), 250-264. https://doi.or g/10.24252/aldev.v3i2.15275
- Alwi, L., Tjoanda, M., & Radjawane, P. (2023). Ganti kerugian akibat wanprestasi perjanjian kerja sama (bagi hasil): Kajian KUH Perdata. KANJOLI Business Law Review, 1(2), 105-112. https://do i.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v1i2.11618
- Ariadin. (2023). Perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perspektif hukum kontrak di Indonesia. Jurnal Pelita Nusantara, 1(3), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.59996/jurnalpelitanusantara.v1i3.505
- Arifin, M. (2020). Membangun konsep ideal penerapan asas iktikad baik dalam hukum perjanjian. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2119
- Arifin, M., Arifin, Z., & Thuong, M. T. H. (2023). The principle of proportionality on digital business agreements: Between mitigation and orientation. Indonesia Private Law Review, 4(1), 47-56. http s://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954
- Atmoko, D., & Noviriska, N. (2024). Kepastian hukum dalam transaksi online: Peran asas itikad baik berdasarkan hukum perdata Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.3789 3/jbh.v13i2.955
- Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi dalam sistem hukum perdata. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 974-985. https://doi.org/ 10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440
- Dharmayuda, M. S., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Pritayanti Dinar, I. G. A. A. (2022). Penyelesaian wanprestasi perjanjian jasa wedding organizer akibat force majeure. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 4(2), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.4.2.2022.130-135
- Djatmiko, A. A., Setyaningrum, F., & Zainudin, R. (2022). Implementasi bentuk ganti rugi menurut Burgerlijk Wetboek (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata) Indonesia. Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v1i7.350
- Fauzi, Z., Istawi, L. A., Maula Salam, D., & Rajib, R. K. (2025). Kebutuhan reformulasi klausula force majeure dalam kontrak event organizer: Analisis kasus Hammersonic Festival 2020. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 44(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.66749/6h3kmz40
- Fista, Y. L., Machmud, A., & Suartini, S. (2023). Perlindungan hukum konsumen dalam transaksi e-commerce ditinjau dari perspektif undang-undang perlindungan konsumen. Binamulia Hukum, 12(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.599
- Hafiz, M., & Sukirno, S. (2024). Compensation in the termination of agreement due to breach of contract. International Journal of Multi Discipline Science, 7(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds
- Hapsari, L. A., & Setiyawan, A. (2023). Penerapan asas itikad baik dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 4(3), 436-454. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaake n.v4i3.31365
- Hossain, M. Z., Hasan, L., & Hasan, M. H. (2024). Corporate governance, CSR, and financial transparency: An integrative framework. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 13, 342–375. htt ps://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2024.132017
- Ilyasa, A. R., & Wahyuni, R. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban majikan atas perbuatan melawan hukum bawahan dalam perspektif vicarious liability. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(3), 2545-2561. https://do i.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.13074
- Isman, I. (2021). Kumulasi gugatan antara perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i1.370
- Iwanti, N. A. M., & Taun. (2022). Akibat hukum wanprestasi serta upaya hukum wanprestasi berdasarkan undang-undang yang berlaku. The Juris, 6(2), 361-351. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris. v6i2.601
- Jibril, M., & Ekadhani, T. A. (2022). Legal assurance: A comparative study of the good faith doctrine in Australia and Indonesia. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 11(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurispru dence.v11i2.13718
- Manjayani, R. A., & Manulang, S. O. (2022). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum sebagai akibat penghinaan melalui aplikasi. Jurnal Begawan Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10. 37893/abioso.v13i2.117
- Mihardja, A., Kurniawan, C., & Anthony, K. (2020). Vicarious liability: Perspektif masa kini. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(1), 73-81..
- Mohd Safri Mohammed Naaim, Siti Hajar Md. Yusof, & Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir. (2023). Analysing the conditions for establishing vicarious liability in Malaysia. Borneo Akademika, 7(2), 1-14. http s://doi.org/10.51200/ba.v7i2.4672
- Mubinda, B. A. Z., Sutrisno, B., & Mulada, D. A. (2023). Analisis hukum terhadap perjanjian kerjasama antara event organizer (EO) dengan vendor: Studi di Rossa Wedding Planner & Event Organizer. Commerce Law, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/commercelaw.v3i2.3435
- Paendong, K., & Taunaumang, H. (2022). Kajian yuridis wanprestasi dalam perikatan dan perjanjian ditinjau dari hukum perdata. Lex Privatum, 10(3), 1-7..
- Puryanto, B. R., Ardana, I. G. N. A., & Sudibya, I. G. K. A. (2021). Perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja dengan perjanjian kerja tidak tertulis pada perusahaan pemberi kerja. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3109.158-162
- Rahman, H. Y., Hakim, A. R. B., & Wisudawan, I. G. A. (2022). Tanggung jawab pengusaha penyelenggara kegiatan (event organizer) terhadap konsumen. Commerce Law, 2(1). https://doi.or g/10.29303/commercelaw.v2i1.1349
- Runtunuwu, R. T., Pangkerego, O. A., & Karamoy, R. V. (2022). Kajian terhadap tanggung gugat karena wanprestasi dan perbuatan melanggar hukum berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum, 10(1), 240-248..
- Sani Pratiwi, A., Pujiastuti, E., & Arifin, Z. (2024). Implikasi bentuk perjanjian kerja terhadap perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja pada usaha mikro dan kecil. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1897-1910. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.11030
- Silitonga, F. (2022). Immaterial losses in breach of contract lawsuit in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 23158-23165. https:// doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6178
- Sugiyono, H. S. (2024). Government policy in Indonesian contract law that still uses contract law inherited from Dutch product. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1 108/IJLMA-09-2022-0203
- Sujayadi, S., Wijayanta, T., & Herliana. (2023). Regulating court jurisdiction to protect weaker parties: An overview of the Indonesian civil justice system. Yuridika, 38(2), 305-332. https://doi.or g/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.43835
- Tamba, T., & Mukharom, M. (2023). Efektivitas peran mediator dalam penyelesaian sengketa non litigasi dalam bidang bisnis maupun hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), 3(2), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.36908/jimpa.v3i2.247
- Torsello, M., & Winkler, M. M. (2020). Coronavirus-infected international business transactions: A preliminary diagnosis. European Review of Contract Law, 16(2), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1017/ err.2020.30
- Yonatan, Wijayanta, T., Sugiri, B., Sukarmi, & Sulistio, F. (2024). Criminalizing civil law actions of default into criminal acts of fraud: A human rights perspective. Yuridika, 39(3), 303-328. https://do i.org/10.20473/ydk.v39i3.51329

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.