JIHHAM

Article Details

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juli

Articles

Law Enforcement Effectiveness Against Motor Vehicle Theft at Surabaya Metropolitan Police

A Ari Setiawan N Noenik Soekorini R Renda Aranggraeni
Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the effectiveness of law enforcement against motor vehicle theft within the jurisdiction of the Surabaya Metropolitan Police, identifies the factors influencing such effectiveness, and examines efforts to combat the crime.
Research Methodology: An empirical legal research method with a sociological juridical approach was employed. Data were collected through document analysis of statutory regulations, official police reports, court decisions, and relevant scientific journals.
Results: Law enforcement effectiveness is shaped by five interrelated factors: legal structure, officer capacity, facilities and infrastructure, community participation, and legal culture. Organized fencing networks and increasingly sophisticated offender methods remain the most significant obstacles. Available data indicate an overall crime rate reduction of approximately 4% between 2022 and 2023, with a case clearance rate of 78.9%, though curanmor-specific performance indicators remain largely undisclosed.
Conclusions: Improving law enforcement quality, optimizing technology use, and strengthening community participation are essential to reduce motor vehicle theft. Repressive measures under Article 363 of the Criminal Code are the primary legal instrument but require complementary preventive strategies to be fully effective.
Limitations: This study is confined to the Surabaya Metropolitan Police jurisdiction and relies primarily on secondary qualitative data, which may restrict the generalizability of findings.
Contributions: This study contributes to criminal law scholarship by integrating criminological theory with empirical legal analysis, offering evidence-based insights for crime prevention policy.

Keywords: Criminal Law Law Enforcement Metropolitan Police Motor Vehicle Theft Vehicle Theft Crime
How to Cite
Setiawan, A., Soekorini, N. ., & Aranggraeni, R. . (2026). Law Enforcement Effectiveness Against Motor Vehicle Theft at Surabaya Metropolitan Police. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 6(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6787
References
  1. Abramovaite, J., Bandyopadhyay, S., Bhattacharya, S., & Cowen, N. (2023). Classical deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 20(5), 1663-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415
  2. Amri, Y. I., Bawono, B. T., & Maerani, I. A. (2021). Criminal investigation of motorcycle stealing goods. Law Development Journal, 3(1), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.1.169-174
  3. Anggraini, M., & Lenny, L. (2021). Peran kepolisian dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana penadahan kendaraan bermotor hasil curian (studi pada Polresta Barelang). Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 8(4), 670-686. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v8i4.670-686
  4. Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana.
  5. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
  6. Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.117 7/16094069231183620
  7. Braithwaite, J. (2016). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 36(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqw014
  8. Chalfin, A., & McCrary, J. (2017). Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 5-48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20141147
  9. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
  10. Detik News. (2023). Polrestabes Surabaya anev 2023: Crime rate turun 4% dan clearance rate 78.9%. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com
  11. Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective.
  12. Gunadi, K. T. A., & Subawa, I. B. G. (2021). Upaya pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana pencurian kendaraan bermotor dalam perspektif KUHP di Ditreskrimum Polda Bali. Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa, 1(2), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhm.v1i2
  13. Gómez, S., Mejía, D., & Tobón, S. (2021). The deterrent effect of surveillance cameras on crime. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22280
  14. Hartanto, E., Ablisar, M., Mulyadi, M., & Marlina. (2015). Kebijakan kriminal terhadap pencegahan pencurian kenderaan bermotor (Studi di Kepolisian Sektor Sunggal). USU Law Journal, 3(1), 101-112.
  15. Mansah, I. R. H. F., & Oktama, A. (2023). Penegakan hukum terhadap pencurian kendaraan bermotor berdasarkan pasal 362 KUHP di wilayah kepolisian Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(15), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8210277
  16. Marsiawan, H., Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Bawono, B. T. (2022). The law enforcement on crime of motorcycle theft. Law Development Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.4.2
  17. Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
  18. Muladi. (2010). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.
  19. Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26. h ttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
  20. Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113310
  21. Nugraha, F. T. (2023). Tindak pidana pencurian kendaraan bermotor dalam perspektif kriminologi. Lex Laguens: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.08221/lexlaguen s.v1i1.3
  22. Pennisi, C. (2022). Legal culture and empirical research: Improving the socio-legal character of the sociology of law. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(6), 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/00 00-0000-0000-1323
  23. Prakoso, M. Z., Benzema, M. K., Hidayat, W., & Fadilah, D. M. (2025). Juridical review of the role of the police of the Republic of Indonesia in law enforcement of motorcycle theft cases: A case study of Kesambi Police, Cirebon City. Jurnal Abdisci, 3(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.62885/abdisci.v 3i2.735
  24. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan hukum: Suatu tinjauan sosiologis. Genta Publishing.
  25. Reynald, D. M. (2015). Guardianship and the routine activity approach: Time for a broader conception of guardianship. Criminology, 53(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12072
  26. Sinaga, S., Sianturi, R. H., & Leonardo, F. (2024). Pertanggung jawaban kepada pelaku pencurian yang dilakukan dua orang atau lebih dengan bersekutu ditinjau dalam Pasal 363 Ayat (1) KE-4 KUHP (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. legisa, 16(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.58350/leg.v1 6i1.384
  27. Soekanto, S. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum (rev. ed.). RajaGrafindo Persada.
  28. Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. K. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does Western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(4), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816638705
  29. Tyler, T. R. (2017). Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113320
  30. Wicaksono, H., Budiyono, & Dwiatmodjo, H. (2021). Penerapan Pasal 363 KUHP tindak pidana pencurian dalam keadaan memberatkan (Tinjauan yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap Nomor 235/Pid.B/2015/PN.Clp). Soedirman Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20884/ 1.slr.2021.3.1.127
License & Copyright